Perry et al v. Schwarzenegger et al

Filing 645

USCA Case Number 10-15649 9th Circuit (far, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/26/2010)

Case: 10-15649

03/25/2010

Page: 1 of 4

ID: 7278850

DktEntry: 1-2

Office of the Clerk United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Post Office Box 193939 San Francisco, California 94119-3939 415-355-8000
Molly C. Dwyer Clerk of Court

March 25, 2010

No.: D.C. No.: Short Title:

10-15649 3:09-cv-02292-VRW Kristin Perry, et al v. Arnold Schwarzenegger, et al

Dear Appellant/Counsel A copy of your notice of appeal/petition has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number shown above has been assigned to this case. You must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number whenever you communicate with this court regarding this case. Please furnish this docket number immediately to the court reporter if you place an order, or have placed an order, for portions of the trial transcripts. The court reporter will need this docket number when communicating with this court. The due dates for filing the parties' briefs and otherwise perfecting the appeal have been set by the enclosed "Time Schedule Order," pursuant to applicable FRAP rules. These dates can be extended only by court order. Failure of the appellant to comply with the time schedule order will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. 9th Cir. R. 42-1. Enclosed with this letter is an appellate processing schedule along with a case processing checklist to help you monitor the progress of your case.

Case: 10-15649

03/25/2010

Page: 2 of 4

ID: 7278850

DktEntry: 1-2

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FILED
MAR 25 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

KRISTIN M. PERRY; SANDRA B. STIER; PAUL T. KATAMI; JEFFREY J. ZARRILLO, Plaintiffs - Appellees, and CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Intervenor-Plaintiff, v. ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, in his official capacity as Governor of California; EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., in his official capacity as Attorney General of California; MARK B. HORTON, in his official capacity as director of the California Department of Public Health and state registrar of vital statistics; LINETTE SCOTT, in her official capacity as deputy director of health information & strategic planning for the California Department of Public Health; PATRICK O'CONNELL, in his official capacity as clerk-recorder of the

No. 10-15649 D.C. No. 3:09-cv-02292-VRW U.S. District Court for Northern California, San Francisco TIME SCHEDULE ORDER

Case: 10-15649

03/25/2010

Page: 3 of 4

ID: 7278850

DktEntry: 1-2

County of Alameda; DEAN C. LOGAN, in his official capacity as registrarrecorder/county-clerk for the County of Los Angeles, Defendants, and DENNIS HOLLINGSWORTH; GAIL J. KNIGHT; MARTIN F. GUTIERREZ; HAK-SHING WILLIAM TAM; MARK A. JANSSON; PROTECTMARRIAGE.COM - YES ON 8, A PROJECT OF CALIFORNIA RENEWAL, as official proponets of Propostiion 8, Intervenor-Defendants - Appellees, EQUALITY CALIFORNIA; NO ON PROPOSITION 8, CAMPAIGN FOR MARRIAGE EQUALITY, A PROJECT OF THE AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA, Third parties - Appellants, and CALIFORNIANS AGAINST ELIMINATING BASIC RIGHTS, Third party.

The parties shall meet the following time schedule.

Case: 10-15649

03/25/2010

Page: 4 of 4

ID: 7278850

DktEntry: 1-2

If there were reported hearings, the parties shall designate and, if necessary, crossdesignate the transcripts pursuant to 9th Cir. R. 10-3.1. If there were no reported hearings, the transcript deadlines do not apply. Fri., April 23, 2010 Mon., May 24, 2010 Fri., July 2, 2010 Transcript shall be ordered. Transcript shall be filed by court reporter. Appellant's opening brief and excerpts of record shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 32 and 9th Cir. R. 32-1. Appellee's answering brief and excerpts of record shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 32 and 9th Cir. R. 32-1.

Mon., August 2, 2010

The optional appellant's reply brief shall be filed and served within fourteen days of service of the appellees' brief, pursuant to FRAP 32 and 9th Cir. R. 32-1. Failure of the appellant to comply with the Time Schedule Order will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. FOR THE COURT: Molly C. Dwyer Clerk of Court Ruben Talavera Deputy Clerk