Securities & Exchange Commission v. Pegasus Wireless Corporation et al

Filing 98

ORDER re Docket No. 93 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Stephen Durland. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 5/24/11. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/24/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, No. C 09-02302 JSW 10 ORDER RE DOCKET NO. 93 11 v. For the Northern District of California United States District Court Plaintiff, 12 PEGASUS WIRELESS CORPORATION, 13 Defendants. 14 / 15 16 On May 9, 2011, this Court granted the parties’ stipulation to continue certain deadlines 17 in this case. In that Order, the Court directed the parties to advise the Court by no later than 18 May 20, 2011, as to whether a ruling was necessary on Mr. Durland’s motion to appoint counsel 19 or whether the matter had been resolved. The parties failed to file a response on that date. 20 The Court shall afford the parties one further opportunity to apprise the Court of the 21 status of this motion. Accordingly, by no later than June 3, 2011, the parties shall advise the 22 Court as to whether a ruling is necessary or whether the motion is now moot. If the parties fail 23 to file a response by that date, the Court shall presume no further action is necessary and shall 24 deny the motion as moot and without prejudice to Mr. Durland’s refiling the motion if 25 circumstances change. 26 // 27 // 28 // 1 2 3 Plaintiff shall serve a copy of this Order on any party who is not represented by counsel and shall file proof of such service with the Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 Dated: May 24, 2011 JEFFREY S. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 6 7 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?