United States Of America v. Approximately $8,800 in American Express Travelers' Checks et al

Filing 29

REQUEST FOR RESPONSE TO MOTION TO STAY FORFEITURE PROCEEDINGS. Signed by Judge Alsup on December 27, 2010. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/27/2010)

Download PDF
United States Of America v. Approximately $8,800 in American Express ...lers' Checks et al Doc. 29 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. APPROXIMATELY $8,800 IN AMERICAN EXPRESS TRAVELERS' CHECKS, and ONE PENTAX 35mm CAMERA, SERIAL NUMBER 1318242, Defendants. / REQUEST FOR RESPONSE TO MOTION TO STAY FORFEITURE PROCEEDINGS No. C 09-02308 WHA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff has filed a motion to stay this civil forfeiture action. Under the civil local rules, Gary Hardeman, claimant acting pro se, was required to file an opposition brief (or a statement of nonopposition) to the pending motion by December 16. No response has been filed. Claimant Hardeman is requested to respond to state his position with respect to the motion and, if he opposes the motion, on what grounds, by JANUARY 14, 2011. If Claimant Hardeman does not respond by that date, the motion will be decided without the benefit of his response. The hearing on January 6, 2011, is VACATED. Although plaintiff's motion indicates that Claimant Hardeman was incarcerated beginning on November 24, 2010, the bureau of prisons' website indicates that he was released Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 on December 8, 2010. Hence it shall suffice to serve him at his address of record in this action, i.e., his home address. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 27, 2010. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?