United States Of America v. Approximately $8,800 in American Express Travelers' Checks et al
Filing
44
STIPULATION AND ORDER SETTING STATUS CONFERENCE re 43 Joint Case Management Statement filed by United States Of America (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/17/2012)
1
2
MELINDA HAAG (CSBN 132612)
United States Attorney
3
MIRANDA KANE (CSBN 150630)
Chief, Criminal Division
4
5
6
7
8
9
DAVID B. COUNTRYMAN (CSBN 226995)
Assistant United States Attorney
450 Golden Gate Avenue, 11th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94102
Telephone: 415.436.7303
Facsimile: 415.436.7234
Email: david.countryman@usdoj.gov
Attorneys for United States of America
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
14
15
16
Plaintiff,
v.
18
APPROXIMATELY $8,800 IN
AMERICAN EXPRESS TRAVELERS’
CHECKS; AND ONE PENTAX 35mm
CAMERA, SERIAL NUMBER 1318242
19
Defendant.
17
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 09-02308 WHA
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
STATEMENT AND PROPOSED ORDER TO
STAY
20
21
22
Plaintiff, United States of America, and claimant Claimant Gary Hardeman respectfully
submit this Joint Case Management Statement.
23
1. Jurisdiction and Service
24
This Court has jurisdiction under Title 28, United States Code, Sections 1345 and
25
1355(a); Title 18, United States Code, Section 981(a)(1)(A); Title 18, United States Code,
26
Sections 2254; Title 18, United States Code, Section 2428. There are no counterclaims. Plaintiff
27
has served notice of this action on all persons who may have an interest in the property,
28
including the following: Claimant Gary Hardeman
1
2. Facts
2
On November 30, 2008, Gary Hardeman was arrested at the San Francisco International
3
Airport after boarding a flight to Mexico. Among his belongings, agents found and seized the
4
defendant property. Hardeman was arrested on an outstanding warrant for failing to register as a
5
sex offender, and charges are currently pending in San Francisco County Superior Court.
6
Hardeman was also arrested for Engaging in Illicit Sexual Conduct in Foreign Places, and
7
charges are currently pending in the federal District Court for the Northern District of California.
8
9
3. Principal Factual and Legal Issues
10
The principal factual and legal issues in dispute are: 1) whether plaintiff can establish by
11
a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant property is property intended to be used to
12
commit or promote the sexual exploitation of children, illegal sexual activity, or child
13
pornography; (2) whether plaintiff can establish by a preponderance of the evidence that the
14
defendant property is property involved money laundering relating to illegal sexual activity or
15
the sexual exploitation of children; 3) whether claimant Gary Hardeman can establish by a
16
preponderance of the evidence that he is an innocent owner of the defendant property.
17
4. Anticipated Motions
18
On January 5, 2011, Court stayed the instant civil forfeiture case until April 7, 2011, due
19
to claimant’s pending criminal prosecution: United States v. Hardeman, 10-cr-00859 RS. On
20
October 20, 2011, the United States filed Notice of Appeal of the District Court’s dismissal of
21
Court Two of the Indictment (Docket No. 79), and on October 21, 2011 the Court vacated the
22
trial and pre-trial dates. Docket No. 82. Oral argument before the Ninth Circuit is set for
23
September 14, 2012. As Mr. Hardeman’s criminal cases are still ongoing, the parties
24
respectfully request an additional stay of this case, so as not to raise the risk of self-incrimination
25
or adversely affect the ability of the government to prosecute the related criminal cases.
26
5. Relief/Damages
27
Plaintiff seeks a judgment of forfeiture of the defendant property. This is not a damages
28
case. Claimant Gary Hardeman seeks the return of the defendant property.
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT AND PROPOSED ORDER
No. 09-02308 WHA
2
1
///
2
6. Settlement
3
Given the stay of this action necessitated by the pending criminal cases, it is too early to
4
anticipate settlement with any accuracy.
5
7. Discovery
6
This is an in rem forfeiture case and is exempt from initial disclosures pursuant to
7
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(l)(B)(ii). Given the stay of this action necessitated by the
8
pending criminal cases, no discovery has occurred.
9
8. Alternative Means of Disposition
10
The parties would be amenable to the assignment of a settlement magistrate, after the
11
resolution of the pending criminal cases.
12
9. Related Cases
13
This case is related to claimant’s pending criminal prosecution.
14
15
Dated: 9/07/12
/S/___________________________________
DANIEL PAUL BLANK
Attorney for Claimant
16
17
18
19
20
Dated:9/07/12
/S/___________________________________
DAVID B. COUNTRYMAN
Assistant United States Attorney
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT AND PROPOSED ORDER
No. 09-02308 WHA
3
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY
2
3
4
5
6
Based upon claimant Gary Hardeman’s request to continue the stay of the current
forfeiture proceedings, the United States’ non-opposition, and for good cause appearing, it is
HEREBY ORDERED that the instant case be, and hereby is, STAYED, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 981(g) until a status conference can be held on OCTOBER 25, 2012.
7
8
9
10
SO ORDERED.
Dated: September 17, 2012.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT AND PROPOSED ORDER
No. 09-02308 WHA
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?