Hernandez v. Trinity Technology Group, Inc. et al

Filing 22

ORDER allowing plaintiff's counsel to appear by telephone at the 12/21/09 case management conference. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 12/16/09. (rbe, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/17/2009)

Download PDF
1 MICHAEL L. TRACY, ESQ. (SBN 237779) MEGAN ROSS HUTCHINS, ESQ. (SBN 227776) 2 LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL L. TRACY 2030 Main Street, Suite 1300 3 Irvine, CA 92614 mhutchins@michaeltracylaw.com 4 T: (949) 260-9171 F: (866) 365-3051 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff 6 PHILIP HERNANDEZ 7 8 9 10 11 PHILIP HERNANDEZ, an individual 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ­ SAN FRANSISCO DIVISION ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) TRINITY TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC., A ) ) VIRGINIA CORPORATION; TRINITY ) TECHNOLOGY GROUP, LLC, A ) VIRGINIA LIMITED LIABILITY ) COMPANY; and DOES 1 through 10, ) ) inclusive, ) ) Defendants. ) Case 3:09-cv-02412-EMC REQUEST FOR TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE FOR INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND [PROPOSED ORDER] PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff's counsel respectfully request to appear 22 telephonically for the Initial Case Management Conference currently scheduled for 23 24 25 December 21, 2009 at 1:30p.m. before the Honorable Thelton Henderson of the above entitled court. 26 /// 27 /// 28 REQUEST FOR TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE FOR INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND [PROPOSED ORDER] 1 1 /// 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 DATED: December 15, 2009 By: LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL L. TRACY _____________/s/_____________________ MEGAN ROSS HUTCHINS, Attorney for Plaintiff PHILIP HERNANDEZ ORDER IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 UNIT ED S 9 DATED: December ____, 2009 16 S DISTRICT TE C ___________________________________ TA HONORABLE THELTON HENDERSON R NIA FO .H helton E Judge T enderso RT U O n ER N F D IS T IC T O R REQUEST FOR TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE FOR INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND [PROPOSED ORDER] -2- A C LI NO RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?