Prather v. AT&T Inc. et al

Filing 141

ORDER granting 140 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Rescheduling Argument on Defendants Joint Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint filed by John C. Prather. Reset Hearing as to 126 Joint MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint (Public Redacted Version) Motion Hearing reset for 6/28/2013 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Charles R. Breyer.. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 4/17/20113. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/18/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

John G. Balestriere*
Jillian L. McNeil**
Email: [e-mail]
BALESTRIERE FARIELLO
225 Broadway, Suite 2900
New York, NY 10007
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff/Relator
*Admitted Pro Hac Vice
** Admitted in the Southern and
Eastern Districts of New York,
and New York State Only
David J. Miclean
Email: [e-mail]
MICLEAN GLEASON LLP
100 Marine Parkway, Suite 310
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff/Relator
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13
14
15
16

Case No.: C 09-02457 (CRB)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex
rel., JOHN C. PRATHER, et al.
Plaintiff-Relator,

17
18
19
20
21
22

v.

STIPULATION AND ORDER
RESCHEDULING ARGUMENT ON
DEFENDANTS’ JOINT MOTION TO
DISMISS AMENDED COMPLAINT

AT&T INC., CELLCO PARTNERSHIP
d/b/a VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS,
QWEST COMMUNICATIONS
INTERNATIONAL, INC., AND SPRINT
NEXTEL CORP.
Defendants.

23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No: C 09-02457 (CRB) (EDL)

1

Relator John C. Prather (“Relator”) and Defendants AT&T Inc. (“AT&T”), Cellco

2

Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless (“Verizon”), Qwest Communications International Inc.

3

(“Qwest”), and Sprint Nextel Corporation (“Sprint”), (collectively, “Defendants”), by and

4
through their respective counsel and subject to the approval of the Court, hereby stipulate as
5
6

follows:

7

WHEREAS, argument on Defendants’ Joint Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint

8

was originally scheduled for Friday, April 19, 2013 at 10 a.m. and rescheduled for Friday, May

9

24, 2013 at 10 a.m.;

10
11

WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s counsel is unable to attend the new argument date;
WHEREAS, Defendants’ counsel do not object to a new argument date of Friday, June

12
13
14
15
16
17

28, 2013;
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the undersigned counsel on behalf of
the parties identified below that:
(1)

Argument on Defendants’ Joint Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint shall

be rescheduled for Friday, June 28, at 10 a.m.

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
1

28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No: C 09-02457 (CRB) (EDL)

1
DATED: April 11, 2013

BALESTRIERE FARIELLO

2
By: /s/ John G. Balestriere
John G. Balestriere
Attorneys for Relator John C. Prather

3
4
5

DATED: April 11, 2013

6

MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP
By: /s/ Jonathan H. Blavin
Jonathan H. Blavin
Attorneys for Defendant
Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon
Wireless

7
8
9
10

DATED: April 11, 2013

11

PERKINS COIE LLP
By: /s/ David F. Taylor
David F. Taylor
Attorneys for Defendants Sprint Nextel
Corporation and Qwest Communications
International Inc.

12
13
14
15

DATED: April 11, 2013

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
By: /s/ Douglas A. Axel
Douglas A. Axel
Attorneys for Defendant AT&T Inc.

16
17
18
19

DATED: April 11, 2013

WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY LLP
By: /s/ Edward C. Barnidge
Edward C. Barnidge (pro hac vice)
Attorneys for Defendant Sprint Nextel
Corporation

20
21
22
23
24
25

ATTESTATION UNDER GENERAL ORDER 45, SECTION X.B.
I have the authorization of all counsel identified herein to submit this Stipulation and
[Proposed] Order.

26
27

/s/ John G. Balestriere
2

28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No: C 09-02457 (CRB) (EDL)

1

DATED: April 17, 2013

S
6

UNIT
ED

5

By:

D

Hon. Charles R. BreyerERE
O ORD
T IS SDistrict Judge
I
United States

7

11

LI

ER

er

R. Brey

A

H

10

RT

9

harles
Judge C

NO

8

RT
U
O

4

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

R NIA

3

Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation set forth above, IT IS SO ORDERED.

FO

2

ORDER

N

D IS T IC T
R

OF

C

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
3

28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No: C 09-02457 (CRB) (EDL)

1
2
3
4
5

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Andrew Wolfram, declare:
I am a citizen of the United States and am employed in the County of New York, State of New York.
I am over the age of 18 years and am not a party to the within action. My business address is
Balestriere Fariello, 225 Broadway, Suite 2900, New York, New York 10007. I am personally
familiar with the business practices of Balestriere Fariello. On April 11, 2013 I caused the following
document to be served on the following parties by the manner specified below:

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RESCHEDULING ARGUMENT ON
DEFENDANTS’ JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS AMENDED COMPLAINT
David F. Taylor
PERKINS COIE LLP
1201 Third Avenue, 48th Floor
Seattle, WA 98101-3099
[e-mail]
[By ECF]

Jonmi N. Koo
PERKINS COIE LLP
4 Embarcadero Center, Suite 2400
San Francisco, CA 94111-4131
[e-mail]
[By ECF]

Steven J. Saltiel
Assistant United States Attorney
450 Golden Gate Avenue
P.O. Box 36055
San Francisco, CA 94102
[By ECF]

Douglas A. Axel
Anand Singh
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
555 West Fifth Street
Los Angeles, California 90013
[By ECF]

21

Jerome C. Roth
Jonathan H. Blavin
Kristin Linsley Myles
MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP
560 Mission Street 27th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[By ECF]

22

XXX (ON CM/ECF) I electronically filed and served the document on CM/ECF.

23

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the above is
true and correct and that this declaration was executed at New York, New York, on April 11, 2013.

16
17
18
19
20

24
25

/s/ Andrew Wolfram
Andrew Wolfram

26
27
4

28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No: C 09-02457 (CRB) (EDL)