Prather v. AT&T Inc. et al

Filing 144

ORDER granting 143 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER filed by Sprint Nextel Corp., Qwest Communications International, Inc.. Resetting Hearing on Motion 126 Joint MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint. Motion Hearing reset for 9/13/2013 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Charles R. Breyer. Signed by Judge Charlels R. Breyer on 7/19/2013. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/22/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 David F. Taylor, Bar No. 25689 DFTaylor@perkinscoie.com Breena M. Roos (pro hac vice) BRoos@perkinscoie.com PERKINS COIE LLP 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4800 Seattle, WA 98101-3099 Telephone: 206.359.8000 Facsimile: 206.359.9000 Joshua A. Reiten, Bar No. 238985 JReiten@perkinscoie.com PERKINS COIE LLP Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 2400 San Francisco, CA 94111-4131 Telephone: 415.344.7000 Facsimile: 415.344.7050 Attorneys for Defendants SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION and QWEST COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL INC. 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 15 16 17 18 JOHN C. PRATHER on behalf of himself and the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and the several states of CALIFORNIA, DELAWARE, FLORIDA, ILLINOIS, INDIANA, MASSACHUSETTS, NEVADA, NEW HAMPSHIRE, NEW JERSEY, NEW MEXICO, NEW YORK, RHODE ISLAND, VIRGINIA, as well as the DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 19 20 21 22 23 Case No. CV-09-2457 CRB STIPULATION AND ORDER RESCHEDULING HEARING ON DEFENDANTS' JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS AMENDED COMPLAINT Plaintiff/Realtor, v. AT&T INC., CELLCO PARTNERSHIP d/b/a VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, QWEST COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL INC., and SPRINT NEXTEL CORP., 24 Defendants. 25 26 27 Relator John C. Prather (“Relator”) and Defendants AT&T Inc. (“AT&T”), Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless (“Verizon Wireless”), Qwest Communications International 28 59113-0074/LEGAL27303627.2 -1- STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CV-09-2457 CRB 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Inc. (“Qwest”), and Sprint Nextel Corporation (“Sprint”) (collectively, “Defendants”), by and through their respective counsel and subject to the approval of the Court, hereby stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, the hearing on Defendants’ Joint Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint, Dkt. No. 126, was reset by the Court for July 23, 2013 at 10 a.m., see Dkt. No. 142; WHEREAS, Relator’s counsel and counsel for Sprint and Qwest are unable to attend the July 23, 2013 hearing date; and WHEREAS, the earliest date on the Court’s routine Friday motion calendar on which all parties’ counsel are available is Friday, September 13, 2013 at 10 a.m.; IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the undersigned counsel on behalf of the parties identified below that the hearing on Defendants’ Joint Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint, Dkt. No. 126, shall be rescheduled for Friday, September 13, 2013 at 10 a.m. 13 14 DATED: July 19, 2013 PERKINS COIE LLP 15 By: /s/ David F. Taylor David F. Taylor 16 Attorneys for Defendants Sprint Nextel Corporation and Qwest Communications International Inc. 17 18 19 DATED: July 19, 2013 WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY LLP 20 By: /s/ Edward C. Barnidge Edward C. Barnidge (pro hac vice) 21 22 Attorneys for Defendant Sprint Nextel Corporation 23 24 DATED: July 19, 2013 MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP By: /s/ Jonathan H. Blavin Jonathan H. Blavin 25 26 Attorneys for Defendant Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless 27 28 59113-0074/LEGAL27303627.2 -2- STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CV-09-2457 CRB 1 DATED: July 19, 2013 SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 2 3 By: /s/ Douglas A. Axel Douglas A. Axel 4 Attorneys for Defendant AT&T Inc. 5 DATED: July 19, 2013 BALESTRIERE FARIELLO 6 7 By: /s/ John G. Balestriere John G. Balestriere 8 Attorneys for Relator John C. Prather 9 10 11 12 ATTESTATION UNDER GENERAL ORDER 45, SECTION X.B. I have the authorization of all counsel identified herein to submit this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order. 13 DATED: July 19, 2013 PERKINS COIE LLP 14 By: /s/ David F. Taylor David F. Taylor 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 59113-0074/LEGAL27303627.2 -3- STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CV-09-2457 CRB 1 ORDER 2 ED Hon. Charles SO ORDER S R. Breyer UnitedIT I District Judge States 8 9 RT 11 harle Judge C ER 13 A H 12 yer s R. Bre NO 10 R NIA 7 RT U O DATED: July 19, 2013 S DISTRICT TE C TA FO 6 September 13, 2013 at 10 a.m. LI 5 Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint, Dkt. No. 126, shall be rescheduled for Friday, S 4 Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation set forth above, the hearing on Defendants’ Joint UNIT ED 3 N F D IS T IC T O R C 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 59113-0074/LEGAL27303627.2 -1- STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CV-09-2457 CRB

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?