Prather v. AT&T Inc. et al

Filing 51

ORDER regarding hearing date and briefing schedule re 48 Stipulation, filed by Sprint Nextel Corp., Qwest Communications International, Inc., Set/Reset Deadlines as to 48 Stipulation,. D's answer/response by motion to complaint due 1/17/2012. Responses due by 2/28/2012. Replies due by 3/20/2012. Motion Hearing set for 4/20/2012 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Charles R. Breyer. Case Management Statement due by 1/27/2012. Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/3/2012 08:30 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 1/3/2012. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/4/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 David F. Taylor, Bar No. 129654 DFTaylor@perkinscoie.com PERKINS COIE LLP 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4800 Seattle, WA 98101-3099 Telephone: 206.359.8000 Facsimile: 206.359.9000 Farschad Farzan, Bar No. 215194 FFarzan@perkinscoie.com PERKINS COIE LLP Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 2400 San Francisco, CA 94111-4131 Telephone: 415.344.7000 Facsimile: 415.344.7050 Attorneys for Defendant SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION and QWEST COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 JOHN C. PRATHER on behalf of himself and the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and the several states of CALIFORNIA, DELAWARE, FLORIDA, ILLINOIS, INDIANA, MASSACHUSETTS, NEVADA, NEW HAMPSHIRE, NEW JERSEY, NEW MEXICO, NEW YORK, RHODE ISLAND, VIRGINIA, as well as the DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 18 19 20 21 22 23 Case No. 3:09-cv-2457 (CRB) JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING HEARING DATE AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS’ RESPONSES TO RELATOR’S COMPLAINT AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Plaintiff/Realtor, v. AT&T INC., CELLCO PARTNERSHIP d/b/a VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, QWEST COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL INC., SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION, and TELEPHONE AND DATA SYSTEMS, INC., Defendants. 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. CV-09 2457 CRB 13141-0862/LEGAL22381519.1 1 Relator John C. Prather and Defendants AT&T Inc. (“AT&T”), Cellco Partnership d/b/a 2 Verizon Wireless (“Verizon”), Qwest Communications International Inc. (“Qwest”), Sprint Nextel 3 Corporation (“Sprint”), and Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. (“TDS”) (collectively, “Defendants”), 4 by and through their respective counsel and subject to the approval of the Court, hereby stipulate as 5 follows: 6 7 8 9 10 11 WHEREAS, Relator filed the initial complaint (“Complaint”) in the above-referenced matter on June 3, 2009, and the matter was assigned to the Hon. Bernard Zimmerman. WHEREAS, on November 29, 2011, the Court entered an order providing that AT&T, Verizon, Sprint, and TDS shall answer or respond to the Complaint on January 17, 2012 and setting a briefing schedule and hearing date for their motions (Dkt. No. 22); WHEREAS, on November 30, 2011, the Court reassigned this matter to the Hon. Charles R. 12 Breyer and ordered that “[a]ll matters presently scheduled for hearing are vacated and should be 13 renoticed for hearing” (Dkt. No. 30); 14 WHEREAS, Defendant Qwest appeared in this action through its counsel on December 13, 15 2011, and has agreed with Relator, subject to the Court’s approval, to respond to the Complaint on 16 the same schedule applicable to the other Defendants; 17 WHEREAS, the Initial Case Management Conference in this matter is scheduled for January 18 13, 2012 at 8:30 a.m., and the joint case management statement is due not less than seven days prior 19 to the conference; and 20 WHEREAS, Relator and Defendants further agree that by entering into this stipulation, 21 Defendants do not waive any defenses or submit to the jurisdiction of the Court; 22 NOW, THEREFORE, subject to the approval of the Court, Relator and Defendants stipulate as 23 follows: 24 1. The Initial Case Management Conference, currently scheduled for January 13, 2012, 25 is continued to February 3, 2012 at 8:30 a.m. before the Honorable Charles C. Breyer, and the joint 26 case management statement is due not less than seven days prior to the conference; 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. CV-09 2457 CRB 13141-0862/LEGAL22381519.1 1 2. 2 January 17, 2012; 3 3. 4 Defendant Qwest will answer or respond by motion to the Complaint on or before Relator shall file any opposition(s) to each of Defendants’ Motion(s) on or before February 28, 2012; 5 4. 6 March 20, 2012; 7 5. 8 Defendants shall file any reply brief(s) in support of their Motion(s) on or before Defendants’ Motion(s) will be heard on April 20, 2012 at 10:00 a.m. IT IS SO STIPULATED 9 Dated: December 23, 2011 BALESTRIERE FARIELLO 10 11 By: /s/ John G. Balestriere John G. Balestriere Attorneys for Plaintiff John C. Prather 12 13 Dated: December 23, 2011 SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 14 15 By: /s/ Douglas A. Axel Douglas A. Axel Attorneys for Defendant AT&T Inc. 16 17 Dated: December 23, 2011 MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP 18 19 By: /s/ Jerome C. Roth Jerome C. Roth Attorneys for Defendant Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless 20 21 22 Dated: December 23, 2011 PERKINS COIE LLP 23 By: /s/ David F. Taylor David F. Taylor Attorneys for Defendants Sprint Nextel Corporation and Qwest Communications International Inc. 24 25 26 27 28 2 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. CV-09 2457 CRB 13141-0862/LEGAL22381519.1 1 Dated: December 23, 2011 2 SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 4 By: /s/ Richard J. O’Brien Richard J. O’Brien Attorneys for Defendant Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. 5 *** 3 OR 10 RT ER 13 A H 12 N F D IS T IC T O R 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. CV-09 2457 CRB 13141-0862/LEGAL22381519.1 er R. Brey LI harles Judge C NO 11 R NIA O IT IS S FO 9 ______________________________________ Hon. Charles R. Breyer United States District DERED Court S Dated: _______________ January 3, 2012 8 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O 7 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED UNIT ED 6 C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?