Onoh v. Citigroup et al

Filing 19

ORDER RE SCHEDULE FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION. Signed by Judge Alsup on June 11, 2009. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/11/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ELIZABETH U. ONOH, Plaintiff, v. CITIGROUP, FIDELITY MORTGAGE LLC, HOMEQ SERVICING, WELLS FARGO BANKA, N.A., and all other persons currently unknown claiming any legal or equitable interest in the Trust Property, and DOES ONE through ONE HUNDRED, inclusive, Defendants. / ORDER RE SCHEDULE FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION No. C 09-02481 WHA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The stipulated stay of the trustee's sale pending a full hearing on preliminary injunction is APPROVED and the hearing on this coming Friday is VACATED. A hearing on plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction is set for JULY 30, 2009 AT 8 A.M. Plaintiff's moving papers in support of her motion shall be filed and served not later than JUNE 25, 2009. Defendants' opposition is due no later than JULY 9, 2009, and plaintiff's reply is due no later than July 16, 2009. In light of the comments and courtesy of Attorney Terbeek, no sanctions shall be imposed for Attorney Piccuta's failure to appear. Also, the Court now believes that the short notice contributed to the failure to appear. Attorney Piccuta, being out of the district, may not have had adequate time to make travel arrangements, so no sanction will be imposed. All 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 attorneys and parties should appear in person, including the plaintiff and a corporate representative, for the July 30 hearing. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 11, 2009. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?