Allen v. United Financial Mortgage Corp. et al
Filing
55
ORDER DENYING 54 Stipulation filed by Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc., JP Morgan Chase Bank, California Reconveyance Company (sclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/23/2011)
Allen v. United Financial Mortgage Corp. et al
Doc. 55
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION LOS ANGELES
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO EUEL ALLEN Plaintiff, v. UNITED FINANCIAL MORTGAGE CORP., ALLIANCE BANCORP., MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., CALIFORNIA RECONVEYANCE CO.; GMAC MORTGAGE; JP MORGAN CHASE BANK and DOES 1-25, Inclusive Defendants. CASE NO.: C09-02507 SC Judge: Hon. Samuel Conti [PROPOSED] ORDER RE CONTINUANCE OF TRIAL Action Filed: Removed: May 5, 2009 June 5, 2009
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
A LVARADO S MI TH
Pursuant to stipulation of the parties, by and through their respective attorneys of record herein, IT IS ORDERED:
1.
That trial in this action be continued from April 25, 2011, to
_____________________, 2011, commencing at ______A.M., in Courtroom 1 of this Court; /// ///
1
JOINT STIPULATION ORDER RE: CONTINUANCE OF TRIAL
2080337.1
Dockets.Justia.com
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION LOS ANGELES
2.
That the Pretrial Conference be continued from April 21, 2011, to
_____________________, 2011, commencing at ________ A.M., in Courtroom 1 of this Court; and
3.
All trial related deadlines, including but not limited to all discovery DISTRI
UNIT ED
S CT TE C TAin accordance continued
deadlines and motion cut-off dates, shall be continued trial date.
with the
RT U O
S
D DENIE
amuel C onti
C RN HON. SAMUEL CONTI F D IS T IC T O R UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
JOINT STIPULATION ORDER RE: CONTINUANCE OF TRIAL
2080337.1
A LVARADO S MI TH
A
DATED: March 23, 2011
By:
E
LI
FO
Judge S
R NIA
NO
RT
H
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?