Jurgens v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc.

Filing 20

STIPULATION AND ORDER extending time to 9/21/2009 for defendant file responsive pleadings; Signed by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel on 8/20/2009. (awb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/20/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP A T T O R N E Y S A T LAW S A N FR A N C I S C O STEVEN M. SELNA (SBN #133409) steven.selna@dbr.com JOHN J. POWERS (SBN #145623) john.powers@dbr.com BETH O. ARNESE (SBN #241186) beth.arnese@dbr.com DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP 50 Fremont Street, 20th Floor San Francisco, CA 94105-2235 Telephone: (415) 591-7500 Facsimile: (415) 591-7510 Attorneys for Defendant JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MONIKA JURGENS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC., a New Jersey corporation; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive,, Defendants. Case No. C 09-02530 JCS MHP STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC. TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING UNTIL SEPTEMBER 21, 2009 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING SF01/ 645529.1 CASE NO. C 09-02530 JCS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP A T T O R N E Y S A T LAW S A N FR A N C I S C O PLAINTIFF MONIKA JURGENS AND DEFENDANT JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC. ("Johnson & Johnson"), by and through their respective attorneys of record hereby stipulate and agree to the following: Johnson & Johnson is permitted an extension of time up to and including September 21, 2009, to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: August 19, 2009 DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP By:/s/ Steven M. Selna /s/ Steven M. Selna Attorneys for Defendant JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC. Dated: August 19, 2009 MILSTEIN, ADELMAN & KREGER, LLP By: /s/ Jennifer B. Steinberg /s/ Jennifer B. Steinberg Attorneys for Plaintiff MONIKA JURGENS STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING SF01/ 645529.1 -2- CASE NO. C 09-02530 JCS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP A T T O R N E Y S A T LAW S A N FR A N C I S C O STEVEN M. SELNA (SBN #133409) steven.selna@dbr.com JOHN J. POWERS (SBN #145623) john.powers@dbr.com BETH O. ARNESE (SBN #241186) beth.arnese@dbr.com DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP 50 Fremont Street, 20th Floor San Francisco, CA 94105-2235 Telephone: (415) 591-7500 Facsimile: (415) 591-7510 Attorneys for Defendant JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MONIKA JURGENS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC., a New Jersey corporation; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive,, Defendants. Case No. C 09-02530 JCS MHP [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING SF01/ 650529.1 CASE NO. C 09-02530 JCS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP A T T O R N E Y S A T LAW S A N FR A N C I S C O Based upon the stipulation of the parties and for good cause shown, Defendant Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc. is permitted an extension of time up to and including September 21, 2009, to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. IT IS SO ORDERED. UNIT ED S S DISTRICT TE C TA 20 Dated: August _____, 2009 ER N F D IS T IC T O R [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING SF01/ 650529.1 -2- CASE NO. C 09-02530 JCS A C LI FO I The Honorable Marilyn Hall Patel District Court Judge atel lyn H. P ge Mari Jud R NIA ORD T IS SO ERED RT U O NO RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?