Securities And Exchange Commission v. Son et al

Filing 46

ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO SERVE DEFENDANT JIN K. CHUNG. The deadline for plaintiff to serve defendant Jin K. Chung is extended to March 31, 2010. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on December 23, 2009. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/23/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ROBERT TASHJIAN (Cal. Bar No. 191007) tashjianr@sec.gov THOMAS J. EME (Illinois Bar. No. 6224870) emet@sec.gov Attorneys for Plaintiff SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 44 Montgomery Street, 26th Floor San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: (415) 705-2500 Facsimile: (415) 705-2501 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. PETER C. SON, JIN K. CHUNG, SNC ASSET MANAGEMENT, INC., and SNC INVESTMENTS, INC., Defendants. Case No. CV-09-2554 MMC [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO SERVE DEFENDANT JIN K. CHUNG 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO SERVE DEFENDANT CHUNG This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission's Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Defendant Jin K. Chung. The Court previously ordered that that plaintiff serve Chung no later than December 28, 2009. See Minute Order dated Sept. 25, 2009 (Docket No. 38). Following consideration of plaintiff's motion and accompanying papers, and for good cause shown, the Court grants the motion pursuant to Rule 6-3 of the Court's Local Rules. Plaintiff shall have until March 31, 2010, to serve defendant Chung with the summons and complaint. IT IS SO ORDERED. December 23 Dated: _____________, 2009 United States District Court Judge ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO SERVE DEF. CHUNG 1 CASE NO. CV-09-2554 MMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?