J & J Sports Productions, Inc., v. Reman
ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO COURT'S ORDER; SETTING DEADLINE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT; CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Plaintiff is directed to file any Amended Complaint no later than November 13, 2009. The Case Management Con ference is continued from December 11, 2009 to February 5, 2010; a Joint Case Management Statement, or a Separate Case Management Conference if no defendant has appeared, shall be filed no later than January 29, 2010. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on October 22, 2009. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/22/2009)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff did not provide the Court with a chambers copy of the Response. For future reference, plaintiff is reminded of the following provision in the Court's Standing Orders: "In all cases that have been assigned to the Electronic Case Filing Program, the parties are required to provide for use in chambers one paper copy of each document that is filed electronically. The paper copy of each such document shall be delivered no later than noon on the day after the document is filed electronically. The paper copy shall be marked `Chambers Copy' and shall be delivered to the Clerk's Office in an envelope clearly marked with the judge's name, case number, and `E-Filing Chambers Copy.'"
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
J & J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC., Plaintiff, v. ROBERT FLOYD REMAN, et al., Defendants /
No. C-09-2560 MMC ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO COURT'S ORDER; SETTING DEADLINE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT; CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
United States District Court
By order filed September 18, 2009, the Court directed plaintiff to file, no later than October 16, 2009, an application for default judgment or a statement indicating why it should not be required to do so. Before the Court is plaintiff's Response, filed October 14, 2009, in which counsel states plaintiff "filed its Amended Complaint" on October 14, 2009 (see Response ¶ 2), and requests the Court "forego specifying the due date for [p]laintiff's Motion for Default Judgment" to afford plaintiff time to serve the Amended Complaint (see id. ¶ 4).1 Contrary to the Response, plaintiff did not file an Amended Complaint on October
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
14, 2009, or on any other date. Consequently, the Court construes the Response as a statement of plaintiff's intent to file an Amended Complaint. In light of such stated intent, plaintiff need not file an application for default judgment at this time. Plaintiff is, however, DIRECTED to file any Amended Complaint no later than November 13, 2009. The Case Management Conference is hereby CONTINUED from December 11, 2009 to February 5, 2010. A Joint Case Management Statement, or a Separate Case Management Conference if no defendant has appeared, shall be filed no later than January 29, 2010. IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 22, 2009
MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?