Northern California River Watch v. Golden Technology Company et al

Filing 54

ORDER DISMISSING LOWEST-NUMBERED CASE PURSUANT TO STIPULATION. Signed by Judge Alsup on January 11, 2010. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/11/2010)

Case3:09-cv-02581-WHA Document53

Filed01/08/10 Page1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

Jack Silver, Esquire SBN# 160575 Law Office of Jack Silver Post Office Box 5469 Santa Rosa, California 95402-5469 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] [e-mail] Attorney for Plaintiff NORTHERN CALIFORNIA RIVER WATCH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NORTHERN CALIFORNIA RIVER WATCH, a non-profit Corporation, Plaintiff, v. GOLDEN TECHNOLOGY COMPANY, ARNOLD CARSTON, LARRY CARRILLO, FRANCINE CLAYTON, DOES 1 - 30, Inclusive, Defendants. / Pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1), IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff NORTHERN CALIFORNIA RIVER WATCH, Defendants GOLDEN TECHNOLOGY COMPANY, ARNOLD CARSTON, LARRY CARRILLO, FRANCINE CLAYTON through their designated counsel of record, that Plaintiff's lower case action - Case No. 3:09-cv-02581 WHA may be dismissed in its entirety without prejudice. Each party agrees to bear its own costs and expenses of suit. CASE No.: 3:09-cv-02581 WHA 4:09-cv-05496 WHA

This Document Relates To: 3:09-cv-02581 WHA STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF LOWER CASE ACTION; [PROPOSED] ORDER [FRCP § 41(a)] (Case Mgmt. Conf. - Jan. 7, 2010)

17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: January 8, 2010

/s/ Jack Silver JACK SILVER. Attorney for Plaintiff NORTHERN CALIFORNIA RIVER WATCH

3:09-CV-02581 WHA/ 4:09-cv-05496 WHA Stipulation of Dismissal of Lower Case Action; [Proposed] Order [FRCP § 41(a)]

1

Case3:09-cv-02581-WHA Document53

Filed01/08/10 Page2 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Dated: January 8, 2010

/s/ Peter L. Simon PETER L. SIMON Attorney for Defendants GOLDEN TECHNOLOGY COMPANY, ARNOLD CARSTON, LARRY CARRILLO, FRANCINE CLAYTON

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, ITORDER IS SO ORDERED. THE CLERK SHALL CLOSE THE FILE of the lower-numbered action. IST ES E CLERK SHALL PURSUANT TO SAID STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.DTHRICT C AT T CLOSE THE FILE.
RT U O
UNIT ED

S

ER

N

F D IS T IC T O R

3:09-CV-02581 WHA/ 4:09-cv-05496 WHA Stipulation of Dismissal of Lower Case Action; [Proposed] Order [FRCP § 41(a)]

A

C

LI

FO

WILLIAM H. ALSUP l U.S. DISTRICT COURTeJUDGEsup illiam A Judg W
NO

R NIA

DATED:

January 11, 2010.

IT IS S

O ORD

ERED

RT

H

2