Hu et al v. Lee et al

Filing 50

ORDER by Judge Samuel Conti granting in part 45 Motion to Extend Time, finding as moot 46 Motion to Appear by Telephone. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 2/16/2010. (sclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/17/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 v. LANEY LEE, JASON WANG, STEWARD WANG, ANITA BEI HUANG, JERRY HUANG, EDWARD WONG, KING MARK, I95 MALL OF ASIA INC., A.T.E.C. HOLDING INC., AMERICAN PRODUCTS EXHIBITION & EXCHANGE CENTER (U.S.A.), INC., ETRADE GUARANTEE ASSURANCE CORP., EASY EXPRESS SERVICES CORP., KATHY WANG, RUNAN ZHANG, ANDY TING, Defendants. HENRY R. HU and STEPHANIE F. HU, Plaintiffs, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 09-2588 SC ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT RUNAN ZHANG TO RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The Court has received Defendant Runan Zhang's ("Zhang's) ex parte motion, entitled Notice of Motion and Motion to Extend Time, Motion to Dismiss, Motion to Strike ("Zhang Motion"). This document was e-filed on the Court's electronic docket on February 11, 2010. Docket No. 45. Plaintiffs Henry R. Hu and Stephanie F. Hu ("Plaintiffs") have since submitted a partial Statement of NonOpposition to the Zhang Motion, and do not oppose Zhang's request to extend the time to respond to the Second Amended Complaint. Docket No. 46. The Court therefore GRANTS Zhang's request to extend the time to respond to the Second Amended Complaint, and the 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 For the Northern District of California remainder of the Zhang Motion is therefore taken as submitted as a Motion to Dismiss. The Court will consider the remainder of the Zhang Motion on the papers; there will be no oral argument or appearances. Zhang's Motion to Appear by Telephone (Docket No. 46) is therefore DENIED as moot. The Court will set April 9, 2010 as the effective date for determining the deadlines for pleadings responsive to Zhang's Motion. Plaintiffs may submit an Opposition, or a Statement of Zhang may submit a Non-Opposition, no later than March 19, 2010. Reply no later than March 26, 2010. The briefs must be properly United States District Court 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 e-filed, and must comply with the appropriate Civil Local Rules. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 16, 2010 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?