Currie-White v. Blockbuster, Inc.

Filing 92

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT BLOCKBUSTER, INC.'S MOTION TO STAY ACTION. The motion to stay is denied without prejudice to Blockbuster's filing a new motion should there be a material change in the status of the cases currently on appeal before the California appellate courts. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on September 10, 2010. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/10/2010)

Currie-White v. Blockbuster, Inc.

Doc. 92

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 10, 2010 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge United States District Court IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MELISSA S. CURRIE-WHITE, Plaintiff, v. BLOCKBUSTER, INC., Defendant. /

No. C 09-2593 MMC ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT BLOCKBUSTER, INC.'S MOTION TO STAY ACTION

Before the Court is Defendant Blockbuster Inc.'s ("Blockbuster") Motion to Stay Action, filed August 6, 2010. The matter came on regularly for hearing on September 10, 2010. Charles A. Jones of McInerney & Jones appeared on behalf of plaintiff. Daryl S. Landy of Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP appeared on behalf of defendant. The Court having considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motion, as well as the arguments of counsel, and for the reasons stated on the record at the hearing, the Motion to Stay is hereby DENIED. Said denial is without prejudice to Blockbuster's filing a new motion should there be a material change in the status of the cases currently on appeal before the California appellate courts.

Dockets.Justia.com