Apostol v. Castro Valley Unified School District, et al

Filing 104

ORDER RE 100 Motion for Order to Show Cause. Responses due by 8/19/2011. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on August 12, 2011. (jswlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/12/2011)

Download PDF
Case3:09-cv-02676-JSW Document102 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 10 11 11 12 12 13 13 14 14 15 15 16 16 17 17 18 18 19 19 20 20 21 21 22 22 23 23 24 24 25 25 26 26 27 27 28 28 Filed08/12/11 Page1 of 2 ASEEM S. GUPTA (CSB No. 252858) agupta@sidley.com SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 555 California Street Suite 2000 San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: (415) 772-1200 Facsimile: (415) 772-7400 BRIAN A.E. SMITH (CSB No. 188147) baesmith@dl.com ALDEN K. LEE (CSB No. 257973) alee@dl.com DEWEY & LEBOEUF LLP Post Montgomery Center One Montgomery Street Suite 3500 San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: (415) 951-1100 Facsimile: (415) 951-1180 Attorneys for Plaintiff ROMEO V. APOSTOL IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ROMEO V. APOSTOL, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, vs. CASTRO VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., Defendants. 1 Case No. 3:09-cv-02676-JSW [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING RE PLAINTIFF ROMEO V. APOSTOL'S EXPEDITED MOTION FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Case3:09-cv-02676-JSW Document102 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 10 11 11 12 12 13 13 14 14 15 15 16 16 17 17 18 18 19 19 20 20 21 21 22 22 23 23 24 24 25 25 26 26 27 27 28 28 Filed08/12/11 Page2 of 2 Before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion for Order to Show Cause, or in the Alternative, to Enforce the Court’s Protective Order. It is HEREBY ORDERED that, on _______, at _______, or as soon thereafter as counsel can be heard, in the courtroom of the Honorable Jeffrey S. White at the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California, Defendants SHOW CAUSE why Defendants should be permitted to filed Docket Nos. 91, 92 and 94 in the Pending further order of the Court, the Court shall lock docket nos. 91, 92, and public record. 94. Defendants shall file a written response as to why these documents should not be filed under seal by no later than August 19, 2011. The Court does not require a hearing on this matter. Dated: ___________________ August 12, 2011 By: Hon. Jeffrey S. White U.S. District Court Judge SF 233922.1 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?