Ringcentral, Inc. v. Quimby et al

Filing 75

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO COMPEL. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 5/9/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/9/2011)

**E-filed 5/9/11**

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13
14

RINGCENTRAL, INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.

15
16

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
COMPEL

BILL QUIMBY, et al.,

17

No. C 09-2693 RS

Defendants.
____________________________________/

18
19
20

Prior to the time defendants’ motion to vacate the default judgment was granted, plaintiff

21

moved to compel defendants to produce evidence of their compliance with an order precluding the

22

corporate defendant from transferring or disposing of any assets except in the ordinary course of

23

business, and the individual defendant from doing so except as required to meet ordinary household

24

and personal expenses and necessities of life. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), this motion is

25

suitable for disposition without oral argument, and the hearing set for May 26, 2011 is vacated. In

26

light of the default judgment having been set aside, plaintiff no longer has a cognizable interest in

27

ensuring that defendants complied with the prior order, and it has pointed to no facts to warrant

28

1

departing from the ordinary presumption that court orders have been obeyed. The motion is

2

therefore denied.

3
4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

5
6
7
8

Dated: 5/9/11
RICHARD SEEBORG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2