Ringcentral, Inc. v. Quimby et al
Filing
75
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO COMPEL. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 5/9/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/9/2011)
**E-filed 5/9/11**
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
RINGCENTRAL, INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
15
16
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
COMPEL
BILL QUIMBY, et al.,
17
No. C 09-2693 RS
Defendants.
____________________________________/
18
19
20
Prior to the time defendants’ motion to vacate the default judgment was granted, plaintiff
21
moved to compel defendants to produce evidence of their compliance with an order precluding the
22
corporate defendant from transferring or disposing of any assets except in the ordinary course of
23
business, and the individual defendant from doing so except as required to meet ordinary household
24
and personal expenses and necessities of life. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), this motion is
25
suitable for disposition without oral argument, and the hearing set for May 26, 2011 is vacated. In
26
light of the default judgment having been set aside, plaintiff no longer has a cognizable interest in
27
ensuring that defendants complied with the prior order, and it has pointed to no facts to warrant
28
1
departing from the ordinary presumption that court orders have been obeyed. The motion is
2
therefore denied.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
7
8
Dated: 5/9/11
RICHARD SEEBORG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?