Ringcentral, Inc. v. Quimby et al

Filing 75

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO COMPEL. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 5/9/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/9/2011)

Download PDF
**E-filed 5/9/11** 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 RINGCENTRAL, INC., Plaintiff, v. 15 16 ORDER DENYING MOTION TO COMPEL BILL QUIMBY, et al., 17 No. C 09-2693 RS Defendants. ____________________________________/ 18 19 20 Prior to the time defendants’ motion to vacate the default judgment was granted, plaintiff 21 moved to compel defendants to produce evidence of their compliance with an order precluding the 22 corporate defendant from transferring or disposing of any assets except in the ordinary course of 23 business, and the individual defendant from doing so except as required to meet ordinary household 24 and personal expenses and necessities of life. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), this motion is 25 suitable for disposition without oral argument, and the hearing set for May 26, 2011 is vacated. In 26 light of the default judgment having been set aside, plaintiff no longer has a cognizable interest in 27 ensuring that defendants complied with the prior order, and it has pointed to no facts to warrant 28 1 departing from the ordinary presumption that court orders have been obeyed. The motion is 2 therefore denied. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 7 8 Dated: 5/9/11 RICHARD SEEBORG UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?