Technology Licensing Company, Inc. v. Haier America Trading, L.L.C.

Filing 23

ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION SELECTING ADR PROCESS. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on November 3, 2009. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/3/2009)

LTNITED STATESDISTRICTCOURT N O R T H E R NDISTRICTOF CALIFORNIA
Technology Licensing Company Inc. Plaintiff andcounterclaimDefendant

CASE No.

cv }g-zl2gMMC

Plaintif(s), v. Trading, L.L.C H a i eAmerica r
D e f e n d a n t Counterclaimant and Defendant(s). I

STIPULATIONAND IPROPOSED] ADR PROCESS ORDERSELECTING

Counsel reportthat they havemet andconferred regarding ADR andhavereached the pursuant Civil L.R. 16-8andADR L.R. 3-5: f o l l o w i n gstipulation to T h eparties agree participate the followingADR process: to in C o u r t Processes: Non-binding Arbitration(ADR L.R. 4) Early NeutralEvaluation(ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) (ADR L.R. 6) Mediation ,/ (Note:Partieswho believethat an early settlement with a MagistrateJudgeis conference appreciably more likely to meettheir needs than any otherform of ADR, mustparticipate in an ADR phoneconference maynotfile thisform. TheymustinsteadJilea Noticeof Needfor and A D RPhoneConference. Civil LocalRule 16-8andADR L.R. 3-5) See P r i v a t eProcess: Private ADR Qtlease identifyprocessandprovider)

The partiesagree hold the ADR session to by: the presumptive deadline(Thedeadlineis 90 days from the dateof the order processunless referring the caseto an ADR otherwise ordered. ) ,/ otherrequested deadline45 daysfrom the dateof the Order

Oct 2009 D a t e d : 19,

/s/ JohnW. Carpenter

Attorney for Plaintiff
D a t e d :Oct19,2009
/ s / Tony D. Chen

Attomey for Defendant

/henfilingthisdocument ECF,please sureto usethe appropriate in be ADR Docket v e n t ,e.9.,"Stipulation Proposed and OrderSelecting EarlyNeutral Evaluation."
I P R O P O S E D IORDER Pursuanto the Stipulationabove, captioned t the matteris herebyrefenedto: Non-bindingArbitration Early NeutralEvaluation(ENE) Mediation { PrivateADR Deadlinefor ADR session 90 daysfrom the dateof this order.
other 45 daysfrom dateofOrder

I T IS SO ORDERED. D a t e d : November 3, 2009 I.INITED STATESDISTRICT JUDGE