Sandisk Corporation v. LSI Corporation

Filing 115

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Alsup on March 19, 2010. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/19/2010)

Case3:09-cv-02737-WHA Document113

Filed03/19/10 Page1 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Tharan Gregory Lanier (State Bar No. 138784) [e-mail] Gregory L. Lippetz (State Bar No. 154228) [e-mail] Daniel H. Mao (State Bar No. 221539) [e-mail] Joe C. Liu (State Bar No. 237356) [e-mail] Peter D. Nestor (State Bar No. 262253) [e-mail] JONES DAY 1755 Embarcadero Road Palo Alto, CA 94303 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 650-739-3900 Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counterdefendant SANDISK CORPORATION

Bruce S. Sostek (pro hac vice) [e-mail] Jane Politz Brandt (pro hac vice) [e-mail] Herbert J. Hammond (pro hac vice) [e-mail] Max Ciccarelli (pro hac vice) [e-mail] Richard L. Wynne, Jr. (pro hac vice) [e-mail] THOMPSON & KNIGHT LLP 1722 Routh St., Suite 1500 Dallas, Texas 75201 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Defendant/Counterclaimant LSI CORPORATION and Counterclaimant AGERE SYSTEMS INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION SANDISK CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. LSI CORPORATION, Defendant. Case No. C09-02737 WHA STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS AND COUNTERCLAIMS WITH PREJUDICE Judge: Hon. William Alsup Courtroom 9, 19th Floor Date Filed: June 19, 2009 Trial Date: November 8, 2010

LSI CORPORATION AND AGERE SYSTEMS INC., Counterclaimants, v. SANDISK CORPORATION, Counterdefendant.

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Case No. C 09-02737 WHA

Case3:09-cv-02737-WHA Document113

Filed03/19/10 Page2 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Plaintiff SanDisk Corporation ("SanDisk") and Counterclaimants LSI Corporation and Agere Systems Inc. (collectively, "LSI") hereby inform the Court that they have reached an agreement on the terms of dismissal of the actual and potential claims and counterclaims relating to the dispute in the above-titled action and hereby submit this Stipulation of Dismissal and request for an Order dismissing this action with prejudice. Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the parties hereby stipulate to dismiss with prejudice all claims and counterclaims asserted at any time or proposed to be asserted by the parties in this action. The parties further stipulate that this Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of settlement agreement between the parties in this action.* The parties agree that each party will bear its own costs and attorneys' fees incurred in connection with this action. SO STIPULATED. Dated: March 19, 2010 JONES DAY

By: /s/ Gregory L. Lippetz Gregory L. Lippetz Attorneys for Plaintiff SANDISK CORPORATION

In accordance with General Order No. 45, Section X(B), the above signatory attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the signatory below. Dated: March 19, 2010 THOMPSON & KNIGHT LLP

By: /s/ Richard L. Wynne ______ Richard L. Wynne Attorneys for LSI CORPORATION AND AGERE SYSTEMS INC. * The undersigned will only retain jurisdiction for three years. -1STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Case No. C 09-02737 WHA

Case3:09-cv-02737-WHA Document113

Filed03/19/10 Page3 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 March 19, 2010. Dated:__________________

[PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. THE CLERK SHALL CLOSE THE FILE.
UNIT ED

ER

N

F D IS T IC T O R

-2-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Case No. C 09-02737 WHA

A

C

LI

VED By___________________________ APPRO THE HONORABLE WILLIAM ALSUP l United States District Judgesup illiam A udge W Northern DistrictJ of California
FO

S

ISTRIC ES D TC AT T

R NIA

RT U O

NO

RT

H