Sandisk Corporation v. LSI Corporation
Filing
75
SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER REGARDING RULE 706 EXPERT. Signed by Judge Alsup on January 25, 2010. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/25/2010)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 SANDISK CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. LSI CORPORATION, Defendant. AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS. / / SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER REGARDING RULE 706 EXPERT No. C 09-02737 WHA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
United States District Court
11
For the Northern District of California
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
The Court apologizes if its prior order regarding the appointment of a Rule 706 expert was unclear. Under Rule 706, the undersigned seeks a testifying expert who is one of ordinary skill in the art. While the two candidates proposed by the parties are excellent lawyers, they do not meet this requirement -- they are not persons having ordinary skill in the art relevant to the subject matter and time frame of the patents-in-suit. Please jointly submit BY NOON ON WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 3, 2010, two candidates that meet this criteria. Subject to motion practice, the Court envisions that this Rule 706 expert will testify not only at trial, but potentially at claim construction as well. As such, the two candidates should have qualifications of the type being considered by counsel for their own use in this litigation. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 25, 2010.
WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?