Sandisk Corporation v. LSI Corporation

Filing 78

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED REQUEST TO CONTINUE TECHNOLOGY TUTORIAL TO MARCH 3, 2010. Signed by Judge Alsup on January 26, 2010. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/26/2010)

Case3:09-cv-02737-WHA Document76

Filed01/25/10 Page1 of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Tharan Gregory Lanier (State Bar No. 138784) [e-mail] Gregory L. Lippetz (State Bar No. 154228) [e-mail] Daniel H. Mao (State Bar No. 221539) [e-mail] Joe C. Liu (State Bar No. 237356) [e-mail] Peter D. Nestor (State Bar No. 262253) [e-mail] JONES DAY 1755 Embarcadero Road Palo Alto, CA 94303 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 650-739-3900 Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counterdefendant SANDISK CORPORATION

Bruce S. Sostek (pro hac vice) [e-mail] Jane Politz Brandt (pro hac vice) [e-mail] Herbert J. Hammond (pro hac vice) [e-mail] Max Ciccarelli (pro hac vice) [e-mail] Richard L. Wynne, Jr. (pro hac vice) [e-mail] THOMPSON & KNIGHT LLP 1722 Routh St., Suite 1500 Dallas, Texas 75201 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Defendant/Counterclaimant LSI CORPORATION and Counterclaimant AGERE SYSTEMS INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION SANDISK CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. LSI CORPORATION, Defendant. Case No. C09-02737 WHA STIPULATED REQUEST TO CONTINUE CLAIM CONSTRUCTION TUTORIAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Judge: Hon. William Alsup Courtroom 9, 19th Floor Date Filed: June 19, 2009 Trial Date: November 8, 2010

LSI CORPORATION AND AGERE SYSTEMS INC., Counterclaimants, v. SANDISK CORPORATION, Counterdefendant.

Case3:09-cv-02737-WHA Document76

Filed01/25/10 Page2 of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2010.

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2 and Civil L.R. 7-12, Plaintiff-Counterdefendant SanDisk Corporation ("SanDisk") and Defendant-Counterplaintiff LSI Corporation and Counterplaintiff Agere Systems, Inc. (collectively, "LSI"), through their respective counsel, hereby make the following Stipulated Request for an Order to change the scheduling of the Court's Claim Construction Tutorial. WHEREAS, on September 25, 2009, the Court issued the "Case Management Order and Reference to ADR Unit for Mediation" (Dkt. No. 52) scheduling February 25, 2010 at 1:30 p.m. as the date and time for the Court's Claim Construction Tutorial and March 11, 2010 at 1:30 p.m. as the date and time for the Claim Construction Hearing. WHEREAS, Jones Day, the firm representing SanDisk, will be conducting its firm-wide partnership meeting on February 25-28, 2010 in Florida. The partnership meeting is held only once every two years, and includes the more than 700 world-wide partners of the firm. While the meeting was originally scheduled to begin on February 26, 2010, lead counsels for SanDisk, Tharan Gregory Lanier and Gregory L. Lippetz, learned for the first time on October 26, 2009, that they were required to attend meetings scheduled for February 25, 2010, the same day as the tutorial. WHEREAS, LSI's counsel does not object to the rescheduling of the Court's Claim Construction Tutorial. WHEREAS, subject to the Court's availability, SanDisk and LSI propose the following alternative dates that the parties are available to attend the Claim Construction Tutorial: Monday, March 1, Tuesday, March 2, Wednesday, March 3. Lead counsel for LSI is unavailable on Thursday, March 4. WHEREAS, this Stipulation will not affect other dates in the case schedule, including the Claim Construction hearing that is scheduled for March 11, 2010.

THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE AND PROPOSE THAT: The Court's Claim Construction Tutorial shall be continued to March 1st, 2nd, or 3rd, -1STIPULATED REQUEST TO CONTINUE CLAIM CONSTRUCTION TUTORIAL Case No. C 09-02737 WHA

Case3:09-cv-02737-WHA Document76

Filed01/25/10 Page3 of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Dated: January 25, 2010

JONES DAY

By: /s/ Joe C. Liu Joe C. Liu Attorneys for Plaintiff SANDISK CORPORATION

In accordance with General Order No. 45, Section X(B), the above signatory attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the signatory below.

Dated: January 25, 2010

THOMPSON & KNIGHT LLP

By: /s/ Jane Politz Brandt Jane Politz Brandt Attorneys for LSI CORPORATION AND AGERE SYSTEMS INC.

-2-

STIPULATED REQUEST TO CONTINUE CLAIM CONSTRUCTION TUTORIAL Case No. C 09-02737 WHA

Case3:09-cv-02737-WHA Document76

Filed01/25/10 Page4 of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

[PROPOSED] ORDER Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the Court hereby continues the Claim Construction 1 3 1:30 P.M. 2010 at __ : 3, a.m. / Tutorial to March __, ON MARCH __ 2010. p.m.

PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

January 26, 2010. Dated:__________________

ER

N

D IS T IC T R

OF

SVI-76570v1

-3-

STIPULATED REQUEST TO CONTINUE CLAIM CONSTRUCTION TUTORIAL Case No. C 09-02737 WHA

A

C

LI

FO

By___________________________ RED ORDE T IS SO THE HONORABLE WILLIAM ALSUP I United States District Judge Northern District of California lsup illiam A Judge W

UNIT ED

8

S

S DISTRICT TE C TA

R NIA

RT U O

NO

RT

H