Hernandez v. City of Napa et al

Filing 176

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL SETTING CONFERENCE AND FILING DATE OF JOINT STATEMENT, re doc 175 Stipulation filed by Ryan Hibbs, Garth Bender, City of Napa. The trial setting conference is continued from 4/5/2011 to 5/3/2011 at 10:00AM. A joint statement is due 4/26/2011. Signed by Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on 3/31/2011. (cgk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/31/2011)

Download PDF
Hernandez v. City of Napa et al Doc. 176 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Michael W. Barrett, City Attorney, State Bar No. 155968 David C. Jones, Deputy City Attorney, State Bar No. 129881 NAPA CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE CITY OF NAPA P.O. Box 660 955 School Street Napa, CA 94559 Telephone: (707) 257-9516 Fax: (707) 257-9274 Gregory M. Fox, State Bar No. 070876 BERTRAND, FOX & ELLIOT The Waterfront Building 2749 Hyde Street San Francisco, California 94109 Telephone: (415) 353-0999 Facsimile: (415) 353-0990 Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF NAPA, POLICE CHIEF RICHARD MELTON And OFFICER GARTH BENDER UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA LUZ HERNANDEZ, Plaintiff, vs. CITY OF NAPA, et al., Defendants. Case No.: C09-2782 EDL STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL SETTING CONFERENCE AND FILING DATE OF JOINT STATEMENT IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties hereto, through their respective undersigned attorneys of record, that the trial setting conference presently scheduled for Tuesday April 5, 2011 be continued to Tuesday May 3, 2011 at ten am. 2011. Good cause exists for this continuance as Gregory Fox, attorney for Napa City Defendants, is teaching at UC Davis on April 5 and will be out of state the entire week of April 18th ; counsel for defendant Hallman is unavailable April 21st through the 28th and counsel for the plaintiff is unavailable for the next several weeks because of a serious personal family medical leave matter. All counsel have agreed that May 3 is mutually convenient for the trial setting conference and the 1 The joint statement to be filed Tuesday April 26, STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE TRIAL SETTING CONFERENCE DATE Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 parties will meet and confer on a trial date, pretrial schedule and related matters as requested by the Court in her Order dated March 21, 2011 [Docket Number 173]. If May 3 is convenient for the Court the parties herein stipulate and request an Order continuing the Trial Setting Conference to Tuesday May 3, 2011 at ten am and a joint statement to be filed Tuesday April 26, 2011. So Stipulated: Dated: March 29, 2011 By: LAW OFFICES OF TIM A. PORI /s/ TIM A. PORI Attorneys for Plaintiff LUZ HERNANDEZ BERTRAND, FOX & ELLIOT By: /s/ GREGORY M. FOX Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF NAPA, RICHARD MELTON, and GARTH BENDER Dated: March 29, 2011 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 By: Dated: March 29, 2011 MEYERS NAVE RIBACK SILVER & WILSON /s/ KEVIN E. GILBERT Attorneys for Defendant JOHN HALLMAN ATTORNEY ATTESTATION I hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures for any signatures indicated by a conformed signature ("/s/") within this E-filed document. Dated: _March 29, 2011 /s/ Gregory M. Fox 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE TRIAL SETTING CONFERENCE DATE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER Good cause appearing, THE STIPULATION IS SO ORDERED. The trial setting conference is continued from April 5, 2011 to May 3, 2011 at ten am. A joint statement to be filed April 26, 2011. S ISTRIC ES D TC AT T ER N F D IS T IC T O R 3 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE TRIAL SETTING CONFERENCE DATE A C LI FO D. La lizabeth Judge E porte R NIA 31 Dated: __March ____ , 2011 __________________________________________ Honorable Elizabeth D. Laporte UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE UNIT ED NO RT U O RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?