Toor v. Mortgageit, Inc. et al

Filing 60

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO ENLARGE TIME; EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT. The deadline for plaintiff to file a Third Amended Complaint is extended to April 30, 2010. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on April 23, 2010. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/23/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Before the Court is plaintiff Suman K. Toor's Motion to Enlarge Time, filed April 16, 2010, by which motion plaintiff seeks a ten-day extension of the April 16, 2010 deadline to file a Third Amended Complaint ("TAC"). Defendant MortgageIT, Inc. has filed opposition; no other defendant has filed a response. Having read and considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motion, the Court hereby GRANTS the motion, for the reason that plaintiff has sufficiently demonstrated the need for the limited extension sought therein. Accordingly, the deadline for plaintiff to file a TAC is hereby EXTENDED to April 30, 2010. As explained in the Court's March 26, 2010 order, plaintiff is not required to file a TAC, and, if she does not file a TAC by April 30, 2010, the instant action will consist of the state claims alleged in the Second Amended Complaint. Further, as explained in the Court's March 26, 2010 order, if plaintiff files a TAC, she may not add new claims or new v. FARHAD KHAN, et al., Defendants. / SUMAN K. TOOR, Plaintiff, No. C-09-2850 MMC ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO ENLARGE TIME; EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT United States District Court IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 defendants without first obtaining leave of court. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 23, 2010 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?