J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Ro

Filing 42

ORDER DENYING AUTHORIZATION FOR PROCESS SERVER TO LEVY EXECUTION by Judge Alsup denying 40 Motion (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/15/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 J&J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC., Plaintiff, v. STEVE SANG RO, Defendant. / ORDER DENYING AUTHORIZATION FOR PROCESS SERVER TO LEVY EXECUTION No. C 09-02860 WHA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff J&J Sports Productions, Inc. has obtained default judgment in the amount of $4,350 against defendant Steve Sang Ro. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 69, a money judgment is enforced by a writ of execution. The procedure on execution must accord with the procedure of the state where the federal district court is located, but federal statute governs to the extent it applies. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 566(c), writs of execution issued by federal district courts are ordinarily served by United States marshals. Plaintiff moves pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure § 699.080 for an order authorizing a process server instead of United States marshals perform service. Plaintiff claims that this would "relieve" the United States marshals of the burden of effectuating service. However, there is nothing distinguishing the present matter that would justify departing from the 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 normal course of action in which United States marshals perform the duty of service. Accordingly, plaintiff's motion is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 15, 2010. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?