Nelson v. Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. et al
Filing
124
REQUEST FOR RESPONSE FROM BOTH SIDES. Signed by Judge Alsup on July 13, 2012. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/13/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
9
MICHAEL D NELSON,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
No. C 09-02904 WHA
Plaintiff,
v.
REQUEST FOR RESPONSE
FROM BOTH SIDES
13
MATRIXX INITIATIVES, INC., a
Delaware Corporation, ZICAM, LLC, an
Arizona limited liability company,
14
Defendants.
/
15
16
In two pages, double-spaced, with 12-point font, without footnotes or attachments, each
17
side must explain if granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment of all claims based on
18
lack of evidence regarding causation would be dispositive of the case, notwithstanding the new
19
amended complaint that has been filed. Defendants must file a joint two-page statement. The
20
statements are due by 4 P.M. ON JULY 16, 2012.
21
The Court is concerned with the proliferation of other motions and the fact that
22
defendants have filed two additional motions for summary judgment and a motion to dismiss
23
(not including the various motions to exclude) in addition to the causation motion. For the time
24
being, briefing on all motions shall go forward, but be aware that the Court will deal with the
25
multiplicity of motions in an appropriate way.
26
IT IS SO ORDERED.
27
28
Dated: July 13, 2012.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?