Nelson v. Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. et al

Filing 124

REQUEST FOR RESPONSE FROM BOTH SIDES. Signed by Judge Alsup on July 13, 2012. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/13/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 9 MICHAEL D NELSON, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 No. C 09-02904 WHA Plaintiff, v. REQUEST FOR RESPONSE FROM BOTH SIDES 13 MATRIXX INITIATIVES, INC., a Delaware Corporation, ZICAM, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company, 14 Defendants. / 15 16 In two pages, double-spaced, with 12-point font, without footnotes or attachments, each 17 side must explain if granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment of all claims based on 18 lack of evidence regarding causation would be dispositive of the case, notwithstanding the new 19 amended complaint that has been filed. Defendants must file a joint two-page statement. The 20 statements are due by 4 P.M. ON JULY 16, 2012. 21 The Court is concerned with the proliferation of other motions and the fact that 22 defendants have filed two additional motions for summary judgment and a motion to dismiss 23 (not including the various motions to exclude) in addition to the causation motion. For the time 24 being, briefing on all motions shall go forward, but be aware that the Court will deal with the 25 multiplicity of motions in an appropriate way. 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. 27 28 Dated: July 13, 2012. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?