Nelson v. Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. et al
Filing
44
ORDER RESOLVING DISCOVERY DISPUTE by Hon. William Alsup granting in part and denying in part 39 Discovery Letter Brief.(whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/22/2012)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
MICHAEL D. NELSON,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
No. C 09-02904 WHA
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER RESOLVING
DISCOVERY DISPUTE
MATRIXX INITIATIVES, INC., and
ZICAM, LLC
Defendants.
/
16
17
On March 21, 2012, a hearing was held on the discovery dispute letter submitted by
18
plaintiff Michael D. Nelson. For the reasons stated at the hearing, plaintiff is permitted to take
19
the following discovery: (1) two depositions of seven hours each and (2) ten reasonably narrow
20
document requests. No interrogatories will be permitted. Plaintiff shall not duplicate discovery
21
requests adequately covered by the discovery taken in the MDL.
22
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
25
26
27
28
Dated: March 22, 2012.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
