Ecast, Inc. v. Morrison & Foerster LLP et al

Filing 14

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL re #12 Stipulation filed by Morrison & Foerster LLP. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 10/13/09. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/13/2009)

1 DURIE TANGRI LLP DARALYN J. DURIE--#169825| 2 [e-mail] RAGESH K. TANGRI--#159477 3 [e-mail] 332 Pine Street, Suite 200 4 San Francisco, CA 94104 5 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] 6 Attorneys for Defendants GERALD P. 7 DODSON, ESQ., ERICA D. WILSON, ESQ., and Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff 8 MORRISON & FOERSTER, LLP 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ECAST, INC., Plaintiff, vs. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CASE NO. 09-cv-3001 EMC STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE ; ORDER

MORRISON & FOERSTER, LLP; GERALD 16 P. DODSON, ESQ., ERICA D. WILSON, ESQ., and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, 17 Defendants. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 MORRISON & FOERSTER, LLP, Counter-Complainant, vs. ECAST, INC. Counter-Defendant.

Defendants GERALD P. DODSON, ESQ., ERICA D. WILSON, ESQ., and Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff MORRISON & FOERSTER, LLP, and Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant ECAST, INC., by and through their undersigned counsel and pursuant to Federal Rule 1
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Case No. 09-cv-3001 EMC

1 of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), hereby stipulate that the above-captioned action, including all 2 claims and counterclaims raised therein, shall be and hereby are dismissed with prejudice pursuant 3 to a settlement agreement reached by the parties in this action. 4 DATED: October 8, 2009 5 6 7 8 9 DATED: October 8, 2009 10 11 12 13 14 SIGNATURE ATTESTATION I hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures for any signatures indicated by a THE DECKARD LAW FIRM /S/ Diane C. Deckard DIANE C. DECKARD Attorneys for ECAST, INC. By: DURIE TANGRI LLP /s/ Ragesh K. Tangri RAGESH K. TANGRI Attorneys for GERALD P. DODSON, ESQ., ERICA D. WILSON, ESQ., and MORRISON & FOERSTER, LLP By:

15 "conformed" signature (/S/) within this efiled document. 16 DATED: October 8, 2009 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED: /s/ Ragesh K. Tangri _____________________________________ RAGESH K. TANGRI

UNIT ED

ER

N

F D IS T IC T O R

A

C

LI
2
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

FO

dw Judge E

ard M.

Chen

R NIA

EDWARD M. CHEN U.S. MAGISTRATE DERED JUDGE SO OR T IS

S

S DISTRICT TE C _________________A T

RT U O

I

NO

RT

H

Case No. 09-cv-3001 EMC