Carter et al v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company et al

Filing 98

ORDER Granting 97 Defendant Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, As Trustee's Request for Telephonic Appearance at Settlement Conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edward M. Chen on 3/29/2011. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/29/2011)

Download PDF
Carter et al v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company et al Doc. 98 1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 8 9 10 v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, et al., Defendants. ___________________________________/ DEMONFORT R. CARTER, et al., Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE'S REQUEST FOR TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE AT SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE (Docket No. 97) No. C-09-3033 BZ (EMC) United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 By letter dated March 22, 2011, Defendant Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, As Trustee requested to be excused from personally appearing at the settlement conference scheduled for April 7, 2011. No opposition was filed by any party. Upon consideration of the request, the Court finds good cause for excusing personal attendance and granting Defendant's request. Therefore, it is hereby ordered that Defendant Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, As Trustee be available by telephone from 9:30 a.m. Pacific Time until further notice on April 7, 2011. If the Court concludes that the absence of Defendant Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, As Trustee is impeding the settlement conference, the Court may continue the settlement conference and may order personal attendance by each party. This order disposes of Docket No. 97. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 29, 2011 _______________________________ EDWARD M. CHEN United States Magistrate Judge Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?