The Wilderness Society et al v. United States Department of Interior et al

Filing 81

ORDER TAKING MOTION UNDER SUBMISSION re 77 Joint MOTION to Dismiss; Denying as Moot 80 MOTION to Appear by Telephone. Signed by Chief Judge James Ware on July 6, 2012. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/6/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 8 NO. C 09-03048 JW The Wilderness Soc’y, et al., 12 ORDER TAKING MOTION UNDER SUBMISSION Plaintiffs, v. 13 United States Dep’t of Interior, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 / Presently before the Court is the parties’ Joint Motion to Dismiss Case Pursuant to Fed. R. 17 Civ. P. 41(a)(2). (hereafter, “Motion,” Docket Item No. 77.) The Court finds it appropriate to take 18 the Motion under submission without oral argument. See Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). 19 Accordingly, the Court VACATES the July 9 hearing on the Motion.1 20 21 Dated: July 6, 2012 JAMES WARE United States District Chief Judge 22 23 24 25 26 27 1 28 In light of this Order, the Court DENIES as moot the Stipulated Motion for Administrative Relief for Out-of-Town Counsel to Appear Telephonically at Hearing, Docket Item No. 80. 1 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDER HAVE BEEN DELIVERED TO: 2 Amy Rae Atwood atwood@biologicaldiversity.org David Bernard Glazer david.glazer@usdoj.gov Gregory C. Loarie gloarie@earthjustice.org J. Michael Klise jmklise@crowell.com James Stuart Angell jangell@earthjustice.org Meredith L. Flax Meredith.Flax@usdoj.gov 3 4 5 6 Dated: July 6, 2012 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk 7 By: 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 /s/ JW Chambers William Noble Courtroom Deputy

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?