Dowdy v. Curry
Filing
59
SECOND ORDER RE EVIDENTIARY HEARING. Signed by Judge Alsup on 11/8/2013. (whalc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/8/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
GREGORY L. DOWDY,
13
Petitioner,
14
15
16
v.
BEN CURRY,
SECOND ORDER RE
EVIDENTIARY HEARING
Respondent.
/
17
18
19
20
No. C 09-03144 WHA
After reviewing the record and submissions by both parties, respondent’s request to
vacate the evidentiary hearing is DENIED.
The experts who submitted reports on behalf of both parties must be present for the
21
evidentiary hearing. Dr. A. L. Mathews and Dr. James R. Missett have both submitted signed
22
reports. Dr. David Schatz, however, has not signed his expert report. Respondent must file a
23
signed version of Dr. Schatz’s expert report by NOVEMBER 15, 2013.
24
The three experts’ signed reports will be deemed their direct testimony. Each party will
25
have 30 minutes per expert to cross-examine the opposing party’s expert witnesses. The
26
opposing party will then have 15 minutes per expert to redirect. In order to allow both parties to
27
prepare for the evidentiary hearing, the evidentiary hearing will be continued to DECEMBER 23,
28
2013, AT 8:00 A.M.
1
2
Any proposed amendments to the evidentiary hearing must be submitted by NOVEMBER
15, 2013, AT NOON.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
Dated: November 8, 2013.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?