Dowdy v. Curry

Filing 59

SECOND ORDER RE EVIDENTIARY HEARING. Signed by Judge Alsup on 11/8/2013. (whalc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/8/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 GREGORY L. DOWDY, 13 Petitioner, 14 15 16 v. BEN CURRY, SECOND ORDER RE EVIDENTIARY HEARING Respondent. / 17 18 19 20 No. C 09-03144 WHA After reviewing the record and submissions by both parties, respondent’s request to vacate the evidentiary hearing is DENIED. The experts who submitted reports on behalf of both parties must be present for the 21 evidentiary hearing. Dr. A. L. Mathews and Dr. James R. Missett have both submitted signed 22 reports. Dr. David Schatz, however, has not signed his expert report. Respondent must file a 23 signed version of Dr. Schatz’s expert report by NOVEMBER 15, 2013. 24 The three experts’ signed reports will be deemed their direct testimony. Each party will 25 have 30 minutes per expert to cross-examine the opposing party’s expert witnesses. The 26 opposing party will then have 15 minutes per expert to redirect. In order to allow both parties to 27 prepare for the evidentiary hearing, the evidentiary hearing will be continued to DECEMBER 23, 28 2013, AT 8:00 A.M. 1 2 Any proposed amendments to the evidentiary hearing must be submitted by NOVEMBER 15, 2013, AT NOON. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 Dated: November 8, 2013. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?