Johnson et al v. City of Antioch et al
Filing
21
ORDER SCHEDULING TRIAL AND PRETRIAL MATTERS. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 11/12/09. (jjo, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/12/2009)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 v. City of Antioch, Defendant. / Johnson, Plaintiff, No. CV09-03153 JSW ORDER SCHEDULING TRIAL AND PRETRIAL MATTERS IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
United States District Court
11
For the Northern District of California
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Following the Case Management Conference, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Case Management Statement is adopted, except as expressly modified by this Order. It is further ORDERED that: A. DATES
Jury Trial Date: 12/6/2010, at 8:00 a.m., Pretrial Conference: Monday, 11/8/2010, at 2:00 p.m. Last Day to Hear Dispositive Motions: Friday, 9/24/2010, 9:00 a.m. Last Day for Expert Discovery: 7/30/2010 Close of Non-expert Discovery: 3/28/2010
B.
DISCOVERY
The parties are reminded that a failure voluntarily to disclose information pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a) or to supplement disclosures or discovery responses pursuant to Rule 26(e) may result in exclusionary sanctions. Thirty days prior to the close of non-expert discovery, lead counsel for each party shall serve and file a certification that all supplementation has been completed.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
C.
ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION
This matter is referred to court-connected mediation, to be conducted by March 1, 2010, if possible. The parties shall promptly notify the Court whether the case is resolved at the mediation. D. PROCEDURE FOR AMENDING THIS ORDER
No provision of this order may be changed except by written order of this court upon its own motion or upon motion of one or more parties made pursuant to Civil. L. R. 7-1 or 7-1-(b) without a showing of very good cause. If the modification sought is an extension of a deadline contained herein, the motion must be brought before expiration of that deadline. The parties may not modify the pretrial schedule by stipulation. A conflict with a court date set after the date of this order does not constitute good cause. The parties are advised that if they stipulate to a change in the discovery schedule, they do so at their own risk. The only discovery schedule that the Court will enforce is the one set in this order. Additionally, briefing schedules that are specifically set by the court may not be altered by stipulation; rather the parties must obtain leave of Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 12, 2009
United States District Court
11
For the Northern District of California
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
JEFFREY S. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?