Contreras v. JP Morgan Chase Bank et al
ORDER RE STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND DEFENDANT JPMORGAN CHASE'S WITHDRAWAL OF ACCEPTANCE OF RULE 68 OFFER. Signed by Judge Alsup on May 21, 2010. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/21/2010)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 v. JP MORGAN CHASE FKA WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, NOEMI NUNEZ, WAMU EMPLOYEE NO. 2, GARCIA MARKETING, LLC, HENRY GARCIA, FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, a corporation, RECEIVER FOR WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, Defendants. / ORDER RE STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND DEFENDANT JPMORGAN CHASE'S WITHDRAWAL OF ACCEPTANCE OF RULE 68 OFFER NELIDA CONTRERAS, Plaintiff, No. C 09-03176 WHA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
The Court has received the parties' stipulation of dismissal with prejudice of defendants Noemi Nunez and WAMU Employee No. 2, a.k.a. David Ristedt, as well as defendant JPMorgan Chase's withdrawal of its objection to plaintiff's notice of acceptance of JPMorgan Chase's Rule 68 offer of judgment. Both sides must advise the Court, BY NOON ON MAY 25, 2010, whether this acceptance disposes of the case (meaning, whether any claims remain to be tried) and whether judgment should be entered as stated in the notice. If so, please submit a stipulated form of judgment by the above deadline.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 21, 2010.
WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?