Biba v. Wells Fargo & Company et al

Filing 22

JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO STIPULATION AS TO FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION ONLY re 21 Stipulation, filed by Wells Fargo & Company, Greater Bay Bancorp, The Greater Bay Bancorp Change in Control Plan I. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 5/24/2010. (mejlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/24/2010)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

MICHAEL D. BRUNO (SBN: 166805) MARCIE S. ISOM (SBN: 226906) GORDON & REES LLP 275 Battery Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Defendants WELLS FARGO & CO., GREATER BAY BANCORP, THE GREATER BAY BANCORP CHANGE IN CONTROL PLAN I HARRY G. LEWIS (SBN: 157705) BRIAN DONNELLY (SBN: 162987) EVELYN LOW (SBN: 66636) CORNERSTONE LAW GROUP 595 Market Street, Suite 2360 San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Plaintiff SUSAN BIBA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SUSAN BIBA, Plaintiff, vs. WELLS FARGO & COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation; GREATER BAY BANCORP, a California Corporation; THE GREATER BAY BANCORP CHANGE IN CONTROL PLAN I, Defendants.

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

CASE NO. CV093249MEJ STIPULATED JUDGMENT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE PLAINTIFF'S FOURTH CLAIM FOR VIOLATION OF LABOR CODE § 201 CLAIM

STIPULATED JUDGMENT ON PLAINTIFF'S LABOR CODE § 201 CLAIM

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Gordon & Rees LLP 275 Battery Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94111

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiff SUSAN BIBA ("Plaintiff") and Defendant WELLS FARGO & CO. ("Defendant") that judgment shall be entered in favor of Plaintiff against Defendant with respect to the Fourth Claim of Plaintiff's Complaint for Damages which alleges Defendant's violation of California Labor Code Section 201. Defendant has paid Plaintiff all penalties and interest related to this Claim. Plaintiff shall be awarded her reasonable costs and fees related to this Claim pursuant to Labor Code Section 218.5. The amount of fees and costs to be awarded to Plaintiff shall be determined by agreement of the parties or by post-judgment motion.

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Dated: May 20, 2010

CORNERSTONE LAW GROUP

By: /s/ HARRY LEWIS Attorneys for Plaintiff

Dated: May 20, 2010

GORDON & REES, LLP

By: /s/ MARCIE S. ISOM Attorneys for Defendants

IT IS SO ORDERED. May 24, 2010 The Honorable Maria-Elena James United States Chief Magistrate Judge

Dated:

WFB/1059244/7906991v.1

-2STIPULATED JUDGMENT ON PLAINTIFF'S LABOR CODE § 201 CLAIM