Javier v. Philippine Airlines, Inc.

Filing 81

ORDER by Judge Jeffrey S. White granting 77 Motion for Approval of Settlement (jswlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/13/2010)

Download PDF
Javier v. Philippine Airlines, Inc. Doc. 81 Case3:09-cv-03398-JSW Document77-3 Filed09/08/10 Page1 of 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 BRENT & FIOL, LLP 222 KEARNY STREET SUITE 650 San Francisco, CA 94108 DAVID L. FIOL [Bar No. 203546; dfiol@brentfiollaw.com] JOSEPH P. BRENT [Bar No. 214459; jbrent@brentfiollaw.com] CHRISTOFER C. NOLAN [Bar No. 229542; cnolan@brentfiollaw.com] BRENT & FIOL, LLP 802 B Street San Rafael, California 94901 Telephone: (415) 259-4420 Facsimile: (415) 373-4420 Attorneys for Plaintiffs UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION LEONILA M. JAVIER AND PEDRO JAVIER, Plaintiffs, vs. PHILIPPINE AIRLINES, INC., Defendant, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 09-cv-03398 JSW-EDL [PROPOSED] ORDER APPROVING COMPROMISE OF PENDING ACTION OF PERSON WITH A DISABILITY Date: October 15, 2010 Time: 9:00 a.m. Courtroom: 11, 19th Floor Judge: Hon. Jeffrey S. White 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 October 13 Dated: ____________________, 2010 This Court, having considered the Notice of Petition, the Petition for Approval of Compromise of Pending Action of Person with a Disability, the Declaration of Christofer C. Nolan in support thereof, the confidential settlement agreement lodged under seal with this Court on August 30, 2010, and good cause appearing therefore, hereby approves the proposed settlement between plaintiff and defendant and approves payment of plaintiff's attorney's fees and costs from the settlement. The hearing scheduled for October 15, 2010 is HEREBY VACATED. IT IS SO ORDERED ___________________________________ THE HONORABLE JEFFREY S. WHITE United States District Judge [PROPOSED] ORDER APPROVING COMPROMISE OF PENDING ACTION Case No.: 09-cv-03398 JSW-EDL Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?