United States of America v. Denkers et al

Filing 72

ORDER REGARDING TAX ASSESSMENTS. Signed by Judge Alsup on August 23, 2010. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/23/2010)

Download PDF
United States of America v. Denkers et al Doc. 72 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. WILLIAM B. DENKERS and GLORY M. DENKERS, Defendants. / No. C 09-03403 WHA ORDER REGARDING TAX ASSESSMENTS IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Summary judgment having been granted in plaintiff's favor, all that remains in this action is for judgment to be entered. In this connection, plaintiff was ordered on August 13, 2010, to provide a detailed breakdown of tax assessments for the tax years in dispute by August 16. Defendants were then ordered to verify by August 19 that the government's tax assessments were consistent with the Court's March 29 order, reserving all objections as to substance. In particular, defendants were ordered to verify that a $10,000 offer-in-compromise payment previously paid to the government had been credited against their tax liabilities. Due (allegedly) to insufficient and conflicting information in the government's August 16 filing, defendants were unable to verify that the $10,000 payment had been property credited. Given this dispute, both sides are ordered to meet and confer on this issue and file a joint Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 breakdown of tax assessments for the tax years in dispute and a proposed form of judgment BY NOON ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 31. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 23, 2010. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?