Ringcentral, Inc. v. One Number Corporation et al

Filing 18

ORDER SCHEDULING HEARING ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS. A hearing on the motion is scheduled for October 23, 2009. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on September 11, 2009. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/11/2009)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 To the extent defendants "are not requesting a hearing" on the motion (see Mot. at 1:27-28), the Court advises defendants that if, after briefing on the matter is complete, the Court determines no hearing is necessary, the Court will vacate the hearing.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RINGCENTRAL, INC., Plaintiff, v. ONE NUMBER CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. /

No. C-09-3415 MMC ORDER SCHEDULING HEARING ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS

United States District Court

On September 9, 2009, defendants filed a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction, improper venue, and failure to state a claim, or, in the alternative, to transfer the above-titled action to the Southern District of Indiana. Defendants, however, have not noticed the motion for hearing. See Civ. L.R. 7-2(a) (providing "all motions must be filed, served and noticed in writing on the motion calendar of the assigned Judge for hearing not less than 35 days after service of the motion"). Accordingly, a hearing on the motion is hereby SCHEDULED for October 23, 2009.1 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 11, 2009 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge