Madrigal et al v. Onewest Bank et al

Filing 21

ORDER DISMISSING CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANT UNITED FINANCIAL MORTGAGE CORPORATION. Plaintiffs' claims against United Financial Mortgage Corporation are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on December 28, 2009. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/28/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 By order filed December 3, 2009, the Court ordered plaintiffs to show cause, in writing and no later than December 23, 2009, why their claims against defendant United Financial Mortgage Corporation should not be dismissed for failure to serve said defendant within the time required by Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiffs have not filed a response to the Court's order within the time specified therein. Accordingly, plaintiffs' claims against United Financial Mortgage Corporation are hereby DISMISSED without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 28, 2009 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge v. ONEWEST BANK, et al., Defendants / EDWARD MADRIGAL, et al., Plaintiffs, United States District Court IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA No. C 09-3436 MMC ORDER DISMISSING CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANT UNITED FINANCIAL MORTGAGE CORPORATION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?