Gonzalez v. Wells Fargo Bank et al

Filing 58

STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice; Each side to bear costs; Signed by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel on 6/18/2010. (awb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/21/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ROBERT A. SPANNER SBN 60308 TRIAL & TECHNOLOGY LAW GROUP A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 3723 HAVEN AVENUE, SUITE 132 MENLO PARK, CA 94025 PHONE: (650) 324-2223/(650) 324-2277 FAX: (650) 324-0178 email - ras@techtriallaw.com Attorney for Plaintiff ARMANDO GONZALEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ARMANDO GONZALEZ, Plaintiff, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, et al. Defendants. ________________________________/ CASE NO. C09-03444 MHP STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Plaintiff Armando Gonzalez, having resolved and settled their disputes in the above captioned matter and pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure hereby stipulate and request the Court enter an order as follows: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, that the Plaintiff hereby dismisses the above captioned proceeding with prejudice, and each Party shall bear its own attorneys fees and costs incurred herein. Stip. Of Dismissal Case No. C09-03444 MHP 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SO STIPULATED. June 7, 2010 Dated: ________________ TRIAL & TECHNOLOGY LAW GROUP A Professional Corporation Attorneys for Plaintiff - Appellant ARMANDO GONZALEZ /s/ Robert A. Spanner By: _____________________________________ Robert A. Spanner June 7, 2010 Dated: ________________ SEVERSON & WERSON Attorneys for Defendant-Appellee WELLS FARGO BANK /s/ Andrew Noble By _________________________________ Andrew Noble DECLARATION OF CONSENT I, Robert A. Spanner, hereby declare pursuant to General Order 45, X.B, that I have obtained concurrence in the filing of this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order from Andrew W. Noble, Esq. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 7th day of June, 2010. /s/ Robert A. Spanner _________________________________ Robert A. Spanner ORDER UNIT ED Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. S S DISTRICT TE C TA 6/18/2010 ER N D IS T IC T OF A C LI Stip. Of Dismissal Case No. C09-03444 MHP 2 FO __________________________________ U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE l H. Pate Marilyn Judge R NIA O OR IT IS S DERED RT U O NO RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?