Juarez et al v. Jani-King of California, Inc. et al
Filing
197
JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 11/28/2012. (sclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/28/2012)
1
2
3
4
JAMES C. STURDEVANT (SBN 94551)
(jsturdevant@sturdevantlaw.com)
THE STURDEVANT LAW FIRM
A Professional Corporation
354 Pine Street, Fourth Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: (415) 477-2410
Facsimile: (415) 477-2420
5
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
6
7
8
9
Benjamin K. Riley (SBN 112007)
(briley@bztm.com)
BARTKO, ZANKEL, TARRANT & MILLER
900 Front Street, Suite 300
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: (415) 956-1900
Facsimile: (415) 956-1152
10
Attorneys for Defendants
11
(Additional Counsel Listed on Last Page)
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
14
ALEJANDRO JUAREZ, et al.,
15
Case No.: CV09-03495 SC
Plaintiffs,
JUDGMENT
16
v.
17
JANI-KING OF CALIFORNIA, INC., a Texas
Corporation, et al.,
18
Defendants.
19
20
Complaint filed: June 22, 2009
JANI-KING OF CALIFORNIA, INC., a Texas Counterclaim filed: November 22, 2010
Corporation,
21
Counterclaimant,
22
v.
23
24
25
ALEJANDRO JUAREZ and MARIA
JUAREZ,
Counterclaim Defendants.
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF ALL REMAINING CLAIMS
Case No. CV 09-03495 SC SC
1
Pursuant to the Court’ Order of January 23, 2012 granting summary judgment to Defendants
s
2
on Counts 1-5 and 8-13 of Plaintiffs’First Amended Complaint, and the Court’ Order of November
s
3
28 2012 regarding the settlement of the remaining claims and counterclaims, Plaintiffs’complaint is
__,
4
dismissed with prejudice and Defendants’
counterclaims are dismissed with prejudice.
5
IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED.
6
7
8
Dated:
November 28, 2012
The Honorable Samuel Conti
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF ALL REMAINING CLAIMS
Case No. CV 09-03495 SC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?