Juarez et al v. Jani-King of California, Inc. et al

Filing 197

JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 11/28/2012. (sclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/28/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 JAMES C. STURDEVANT (SBN 94551) (jsturdevant@sturdevantlaw.com) THE STURDEVANT LAW FIRM A Professional Corporation 354 Pine Street, Fourth Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 477-2410 Facsimile: (415) 477-2420 5 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 6 7 8 9 Benjamin K. Riley (SBN 112007) (briley@bztm.com) BARTKO, ZANKEL, TARRANT & MILLER 900 Front Street, Suite 300 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 956-1900 Facsimile: (415) 956-1152 10 Attorneys for Defendants 11 (Additional Counsel Listed on Last Page) 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 14 ALEJANDRO JUAREZ, et al., 15 Case No.: CV09-03495 SC Plaintiffs, JUDGMENT 16 v. 17 JANI-KING OF CALIFORNIA, INC., a Texas Corporation, et al., 18 Defendants. 19 20 Complaint filed: June 22, 2009 JANI-KING OF CALIFORNIA, INC., a Texas Counterclaim filed: November 22, 2010 Corporation, 21 Counterclaimant, 22 v. 23 24 25 ALEJANDRO JUAREZ and MARIA JUAREZ, Counterclaim Defendants. 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF ALL REMAINING CLAIMS Case No. CV 09-03495 SC SC 1 Pursuant to the Court’ Order of January 23, 2012 granting summary judgment to Defendants s 2 on Counts 1-5 and 8-13 of Plaintiffs’First Amended Complaint, and the Court’ Order of November s 3 28 2012 regarding the settlement of the remaining claims and counterclaims, Plaintiffs’complaint is __, 4 dismissed with prejudice and Defendants’ counterclaims are dismissed with prejudice. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED. 6 7 8 Dated: November 28, 2012 The Honorable Samuel Conti UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF ALL REMAINING CLAIMS Case No. CV 09-03495 SC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?