Louisiana Pacific Corporation v. Money Market 1 Institutional Investment Dealer et al
Filing
134
ORDER GRANTING 133 Stipulation to Extend Time to File Second Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on April 13, 2011. (jswlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/13/2011)
Case3:09-cv-03529-JSW Document133
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Filed04/13/11 Page1 of 4
Mark C. Hansen
mhansen@khhte.com
David L. Schwarz (206257)
dschwarz@khhte.com
Kevin J. Miller (pro hac vice)
kmiller@khhte.com
Andrew C. Shen (pro hac vice)
ashen@khhte.com
KELLOGG, HUBER, HANSEN, TODD,
EVANS & FIGEL, P.L.L.C.
1615 M Street, N.W., Suite 400
Washington, D.C. 20036
Telephone: (202) 326-7900
Facsimile: (202) 326-7999
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
R. Alexander Saveri (173102)
rick@saveri.com
Geoffrey C. Rushing (126910)
grushing@saveri.com
Gianna Gruenwald (228969)
gianna@saveri.com
SAVERI & SAVERI, INC.
706 Sansome Street
San Francisco, CA 94111-5619
Telephone: (415) 217-6810
Facsimile: (415) 217-6813
Attorneys for Plaintiff Louisiana Pacific Corporation
15
16
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
17
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
18
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
MONEY MARKET 1 INSTITUTIONAL
INVESTMENT DEALER, MERRILL LYNCH )
)
& CO., INC., MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE,
FENNER & SMITH INCORPORATED, AND )
)
DEUTSCHE BANK SECURITIES INC.,
)
)
Defendants,
)
)
LOUISIANA PACIFIC CORPORATION,
Case No. C 09 03529 JSW
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE
SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
Ctrm: 11
Judge: Hon. Jeffrey S. White
DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE SECOND AMENDED
COMPLAINT; Case No.: C 09 03529 JSW
Case3:09-cv-03529-JSW Document133
1
2
WHEREAS, on July 31, 2009, Plaintiff filed in this Court its Complaint in the abovecaptioned action (the “Action”);
3
4
WHEREAS, on March 8, 2010, Plaintiff filed in this Court its First Amended Complaint
(“FAC”) in the Action;
5
6
Filed04/13/11 Page2 of 4
WHEREAS, on April 21, 2010, Defendant Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. (“DBSI ”) filed
a Motion To Dismiss the FAC;
7
WHEREAS, on March 28, 2011, this Court issued an Order granting DBSI’s Motion To
8
Dismiss with leave to amend, and stating that “[i]f Plaintiff wishes to file a second amended
9
complaint as against DBSI, it shall do so by no later than April 29, 2011”; and
10
WHEREAS, Plaintiff has conferred with DBSI and both parties have agreed that Plaintiff
11
shall have until May 20, 2011 to file a Second Amended Complaint as against DBSI in the
12
Action.
13
IT IS THEREFORE STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Plaintiff and DBSI,
14
acting through their respective counsel, subject to this Court’s approval, that Plaintiff shall have
15
until May 20, 2011 to file a Second Amended Complaint.
16
17
Dated: April 13, 2011
Respectfully submitted,
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
By:
/s/ Andrew C. Shen
Mark C. Hansen
David L. Schwarz (206257)
Kevin J. Miller (pro hac vice)
Andrew C. Shen (pro hac vice)
KELLOGG, HUBER, HANSEN, TODD,
EVANS & FIGEL, P.L.L.C.
1615 M Street, N.W., Suite 400
Washington, D.C. 20036
Attorneys for Plaintiff Louisiana Pacific
Corporation
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE SECOND AMENDED
COMPLAINT; Case No.: C 09 03529 JSW
Case3:09-cv-03529-JSW Document133
1
Filed04/13/11 Page3 of 4
Dated: April 13, 2011
By:
2
3
/s/ Elizabeth A. Frohlich
Jami Wintz McKeon (237923)
Elizabeth A. Frohlich (195454)
MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS, LLP
One Market, Spear Street Tower
San Francisco, CA 94105
4
5
6
Attorneys for Defendant
Deutsche Bank Securities Inc.
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, AND FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS SO ORDERED.
15
16
Dated: April __, 2011
13
17
18
19
__________________________________________
20
Hon. Jeffrey S. White
United States District Judge
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE SECOND AMENDED
COMPLAINT; Case No.: C 09 03529 JSW
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?