Garcia v. Aytes et al

Filing 5

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Alsup on September 17, 2009. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/17/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Robert B. Jobe (Cal. State Bar #133089) LAW OFFICE OF ROBERT B. JOBE 550 Kearny Street, Ste. 200 San Francisco, CA 94108 Tel: (415) 956-5513 Fax: (415) 840-0308 Email: bob@jobelaw.com Attorney for Plaintiff. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA PEDRO MINJARES GARCIA, ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ) v. ) ) ) MICHAEL AYTES ET AL., ) ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________) No. CV 09-3573 WHA PLAINTIFF'SMOTION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL; [PROPOSED] ORDER Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41, Plaintiff, Pedro Minjares Garcia, through counsel, requests that his complaint for relief under the Administrative Procedure Act, currently pending before the Court, be dismissed without prejudice. Because Defendants have accepted his application for asylum, Mr. Minjares is no longer alleging that the Defendants are refusing to accept his application. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays that this Court allow him to voluntarily dismiss his complaint, without prejudice. Motion for Voluntary Dismissal and [Proposed] Order No. CV 09-3573 WHA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DATED: September 11, 2009 /s/ ____________________________ Robert B. Jobe LAW OFFICE OF ROBERT JOBE 550 Kearny Street, Ste. 200 San Francisco, CA 94108 (415) 956-5513 Attorney for Plaintiff [PROPOSED] ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for dismissal of the action without prejudice be granted. DATED: September 17, 2009 WILLIAM H. ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICTD DERE JUDGE UNIT ED S S DISTRICT TE _________________________C______ _ TA RT U O ER N F D IS T IC T O R Motion for Voluntary Dismissal and [Proposed] Order No. CV 09-3573 WHA A C LI FO Judge W illiam A lsup R NIA IT IS S O OR NO RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?