Li v. Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Incorporated

Filing 42

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Show Cause Response due by 9/9/2010. Failure to respond timely to this order shall be grounds on which to enter judgment in 10-2009 VRW and 09-3622 VRW (vrwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/24/2010).

Li v. Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Incorporated

Doc. 42

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 XIN XIN ("Annie") LI, Plaintiff, v MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH INCORPORATED, DOES ONE TO TEN, Defendants. / No C 09-3622 VRW ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH INCORPORATED, Plaintiff, v XIN XIN ("Annie") LI, Defendant. No C 10-2009 VRW ORDER & ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

On May 10, 2010, Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Incorporated ("Merrill Lynch") filed a petition to confirm an arbitration award issued by a Financial Industry Regulatory Authority arbitration panel. 10-cv-2009 VRW, Doc #1. Li has filed 09-cv-3622

a statement of non-opposition to defendant's motion. VRW, Doc #41; 10-cv-2009, Doc #14.

In light of Li's non-opposition to Merrill Lynch's petition, the court GRANTS Merrill Lynch's petition in its entirety and CONFIRMS the arbitration award, 10-cv-2009 VRW, Doc #1; Li is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE on or before September 9, 2010 in a writing of not more than ten pages why judgment should not be entered in favor of Merrill Lynch in the above-captioned cases. Failure to

respond to this order shall be grounds on which to enter judgment in favor of Merrill Lynch in cases captioned 10-2009 VRW and 093622 VRW.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

VAUGHN R WALKER United States District Chief Judge

2