Wilson v. Peter Kiewit Sons, Inc. et al
Filing
100
ORDER continuing motion (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/14/2011)
1
2
3
4
SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
Gilmore F. Diekmann, Jr. (State Bar No. 50400) gdiekmann@seyfarth.com
Francis J. Ortman, III (State Bar No. 213202) fortman@seyfarth.com
Ari Hersher (State Bar No. 260321) ahersher@seyfarth.com
560 Mission Street, Suite 3100
San Francisco, California 94105-2930
Telephone: (415) 397-2823
Facsimile: (415) 397-8549
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Attorneys for Defendant
KIEWIT PACIFIC CO.
LAW OFFICES OF PETER M. HART
PETER M. HART (State Bar No. 198691)
hartpeter@msn.com
KIMBERLY A. WESTMORELAND (State Bar No. 237919)
kwestmoreland.loph@gmail.com
12121 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 205
Los Angeles, California 90025
Telephone: (310) 478-5789
Facsimile: (509) 561-6441
Attorneys for Plaintiff
ASHLEY WILSON
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
ASHLEY WILSON, as an individual and on )
behalf of all others similarly situated,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
KIEWIT PACIFIC CO., a corporation;
)
)
Defendant.
)
)
Case No.: C09-03630 SI
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING
DATE FOR MOTION FOR
PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS
SETTLEMENT
22
23
24
Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 7-12 and 16-2, it is hereby stipulated, by and between
25
ASHLEY WILSON (“Plaintiff”) and KIEWIT PACIFIC CO. (“Defendant”) (collectively the
26
“Parties”), through their respective undersigned counsel, as follows:
27
28
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE FOR MOTION
FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS SETTLEMENT (CASE NO. C09-03630 SI)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
WHEREAS, on May 17, 2011, the Parties participated in a settlement conference with
the Honorable Judge James Larson;
WHEREAS, the Parties provisionally agreed on settlement terms for Plaintiff’s
individual and class action claims at the settlement conference;
WHEREAS, on July 6, 2011, the Parties filed a Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to
Vacate Order Dismissing Case and Setting Hearing Date on Motion for Preliminary Approval,
and requested a hearing date on the Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement
(“Motion”) on August 26, 2011, at 9:00 a.m.;
WHEREAS, the Court entered an Order Vacating the Order Dismissing the Case and
setting the hearing date on the Parties’ Motion for August 26, 2011, at 9:00 a.m.;
WHEREAS, the Court upon request of the Parties the Court continued the hearing date
12
on Motion from August 26, 2011, at 9:00 a.m. to October 14, 2011, at 9:00 a.m. after the Parties
13
advised the Court of their efforts to gather data and finalize the Settlement Agreement;
14
WHEREAS, the Parties are still in the process of drafting a long-form class action
15
Settlement Agreement and have continued their efforts to reach an agreed-upon Settlement
16
Agreement and have narrowed most of the issues that were outstanding and anticipate that this
17
will be their last request for additional time to finalize the Settlement Agreement;
18
19
20
WHEREAS, the Parties require additional time to review the class data, negotiate the
class settlement terms, and hone the long-form class action Settlement Agreement;
WHEREAS, the Parties have met and conferred and due to the schedules of counsel,
21
including a previously scheduled trial, the Parties do not anticipate that they will be able to file
22
the Motion until October 7, 2011.
23
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiff and Defendant,
24
through their respective undersigned counsel, that the Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class
25
Action Settlement will be filed on or before October 7, 2011.
26
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiff and Defendant,
27
through their respective undersigned counsel, that the hearing date on the Motion for Preliminary
28
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE FOR MOTION
FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS SETTLEMENT (CASE NO. C09-03630 SI)
1
2
3
4
Approval of Class Action Settlement be scheduled for November 11, 2011, or as soon thereafter
as the Court is available.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
DATED: September 9, 2011
SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
5
By:
6
7
Attorneys for Defendant
KIEWIT PACIFIC CO.
8
9
/s/
___________________
Francis J. Ortman III
Ari Hersher
DATED: September 9, 2011
LAW OFFICES OF PETER M. HART
10
11
12
13
By:
/s/
__
Peter M. Hart
___________________
Attorney for Plaintiff
ASHLEY WILSON
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE FOR MOTION
FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS SETTLEMENT (CASE NO. C09-03630 SI)
1
]PROPOSED] ORDER
2
3
4
The Parties having so stipulated, and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The October 14, 2011 hearing date on the Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class
5
6
Action Settlement is hereby vacated;
2. The hearing on the Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement is
7
18
hereby set for November __, 2011, or ___________, 2011, at 9:00 a.m.
8
9
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
10
11
12
9/13/11
Date: ______________
13
___________________________
The Honorable Susan Illston
Judge of the United States District Court
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE FOR MOTION
FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS SETTLEMENT (CASE NO. C09-03630 SI)
13635037v.1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?