Wilson v. Peter Kiewit Sons, Inc. et al

Filing 104

ORDER (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/31/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 ASHLEY WILSON, 5 No. C 09-03630 SI Plaintiff, ORDER v. 6 KIEWIT PACIFIC CO., 7 Defendant. 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 / Currently before the Court is the parties’ motion for preliminary approval of the parties’ settlement of this class action. That matter is set for hearing on November 18, 2011. The Court notes that in the preliminary approval papers plaintiff discloses that, “Plaintiff has also settled her individual claims under a separate Settlement Agreement, which does not impact the settlement of the class claim.” 13 Motion for Preliminary Approval at 2, n.2. The parties assert that plaintiff Wilson has not yet received 14 any payment on her individual settlement, and will not until the Class Settlement become final. Motion 15 for Preliminary Approval at 20. However, no information is given regarding the negotiation and 16 settlement of plaintiff’s individual claims which were asserted in the Amended Complaint, e.g., whether 17 the settlement of plaintiff’s claims occurred before or after the class claims were settled. 18 As the settlement of plaintiff’s claims may have influenced the terms of the settlement of the 19 class claims, see Fed. Rule Civ. Proc. 23(e)(3) & Advisory Cttee. Notes, the Court ORDERS the parties 20 to submit a copy of plaintiff’s individual settlement along with a declaration explaining how and when 21 plaintiff’s individual claims were settled. The requested information shall be submitted on or before 22 November 7, 2011. If necessary, the parties may seek to file a copy of plaintiff’s settlement agreement 23 under seal pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 Dated: October 31, 2011 26 27 28 SUSAN ILLSTON United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?