Silva et al v. City of San Leandro et al

Filing 50

ORDER FOR JOINT STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED FACTS. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on September 3, 2010. (jcslc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/3/2010)

Download PDF
Silva et al v. City of San Leandro et al Doc. 50 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 v. CITY OF SAN LEANDRO, ET AL. Defendants. ___________________________________/ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA BARBARA SILVA, ET AL., Plaintiffs, Case No. C-09-03649 JCS ORDER FOR JOINT STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED FACTS United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Defendants have filed a motions for summary judgment, which is set for hearing on October 1, 2010. The Court's Standing Order on Motions for Summary Judgment provides as follows: The parties shall file a joint statement of undisputed facts. If the parties are unable to reach complete agreement after meeting and conferring, they shall file a joint statement of the undisputed facts about which they do agree. Separate statements of undisputed facts shall not be filed and will not be considered by the Court. Civil Standing Orders for Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero, Revised 11/03/08, 17. No joint statement of undisputed facts has been filed in support of the pending summary judgment motion. Instead, Defendants have filed a proposed joint statement of undisputed facts that was provided to Plaintiffs on August 24, 2010. In addition, Defendants have submitted a declaration stating that Plaintiffs have not responded to Defendants' proposed joint statement despite repeated requests by Defendants' counsel to do so. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties shall file a joint statement of undisputed facts in compliance with the Court's Standing Order by Friday, September 10, 2010. The parties are cautioned that any party who objects to a proposed fact without a reasonable basis for doing so may Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 be subject to sanctions. Similarly, the Court may deem any proposed fact to which Plaintiffs do not respond to be undisputed. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 3, 2010 ___________________________ JOSEPH C. SPERO United States Magistrate Judge United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?