Doe et al v. Willits Charter School et al

Filing 157

NOTICE OF REFERENCE OF 143 MOTION for Attorney Fees filed by Willits Unified School District AND ORDER RE MOTION PROCEDURES. Signed by Judge Donna M. Ryu on 8/9/10. (dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/9/2010)

Download PDF
Doe et al v. Willits Charter School et al Doc. 157 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California JANE DOE, Plaintiff, v. WILLITS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al. Defendants. ___________________________________/ TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD: 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 No. C-09-03655-JSW (DMR) NOTICE OF REFERENCE AND ORDER RE MOTION PROCEDURES The above matter has been referred to Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu for a report and recommendation on Defendant Unified School District's Motion for Attorney Fees. Please be advised that the noticed date for the motion filed before the District Court prior to this referral is no longer in effect. You are hereby notified that the hearing is rescheduled for October 14, 2010 at 11:00 a.m., in Courtroom 4, 3rd Floor, U.S. District Court, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, California 94612. Any opposition shall be filed and served no later than twenty-one (21) days prior to the hearing. Any reply to the opposition(s) shall be filed and served no later than fourteen (14) days prior to the hearing. 1. Parties shall comply with the procedures in this order, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and the Northern District of California's Local Rules, General Orders, and General Standing Orders. Local rules, general orders, general standing orders, and a summary of the general Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 orders' electronic filing requirements (including the procedures for emailing proposed orders to chambers) are available at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov (click "Rules" link on left side). The parties' failure to comply with any of the rules or orders may be a ground for sanctions. LAW AND MOTION PROCEDURES 2. Civil motions are heard on the second and fourth Thursdays of the month at 11:00 a.m. Parties should notice motions pursuant to the local rules. Parties need not reserve a hearing date in advance, but should confirm the Court's availability on the on-line calendar at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov (click "Calendars" link on left side, click link to Judge Ryu's calendar, click link to "Scheduling Information and Unavailability"). Noticed hearing dates may be reset as the Court's calendar requires. For scheduling questions, please call Judge Ryu's courtroom deputy, Ivy Garcia at (510) 637-3639. 3. All filings of documents relating to motions referred to Magistrate Judge Ryu shall United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 list the civil case number and the district court judge's initials followed by the designation "(DMR)." CHAMBERS COPIES AND PROPOSED ORDERS 4. Under Civil L.R. 5-1(b), parties must lodge an extra paper copy of any filing and mark it as a copy for "Chambers." Chambers copies shall be printed on three-hole punch paper (including all exhibits) and submitted to the Oakland Clerk's Office in an envelope clearly marked with the case number,"Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu," and "Chambers Copy." In a case subject to electronic filing, chambers copies must be submitted by the close of the next court day following the day the papers are filed electronically. Any proposed stipulation or proposed order in a case subject to electronic filing shall be submitted by email to dmrpo@cand.uscourts.gov as a word processing format attachment on the same day that the document is e-filed. This address is to be used only for proposed orders unless otherwise directed by the Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 9, 2010 DONNA M. RYU United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?