Doe et al v. Willits Charter School et al

Filing 212

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' REQUEST FOR ABSTRACT OF JUDGMENT TO BE ISSUED IN NAME OF MINOR PLAINTIFF AND CROSS-MOTIONS TO SEAL DEFENDANTS' MOTION (DOC 206) IDENTIFY OF PLAINTIFF AND TO RE-TAX COSTS. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 11/13/12. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/13/2012)

Case3:09-cv-03655-JSW Document211 Filed11/13/12 Page1 of 2

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

LOUIS A. LEONE (SBN: 099874)
MARINA B. PITTS (SBN: 120973)
CHERYL L. MACKEY (SBN: 273029)
STUBBS & LEONE
A Professional Corporation
2175 N. California Blvd., Suite 900
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
E-Mail: [e-mail]
E-Mail: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants
WILLITS CHARTER SCHOOL and
SALLY RULISON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19

JANE DOE, a minor, through KRISTEN
D., Guardian ad Litem,
Plaintiff,
vs.
WILLITS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT,
WILLITS CHARTER SCHOOL,
SALLY RULISON, CLINT SMITH and
DOES 1-40,

Case No.: CV 09-3655 JSW
[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING
PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION TO
DEFENDANTS’ REQUEST FOR
ABSTRACT OF JUDGMENT TO BE
ISSUED IN NAME OF MINOR
PLAINTIFF AND CROSS-MOTIONS
TO SEAL DEFENDANTS’ MOTION
(DOC 206) IDENTITY OF PLAINTIFF
AND TO RE-TAX COSTS

Defendants.

20
21

Plaintiff’s opposition to Defendants’ request for abstract of judgment to be issued

22

in name of minor plaintiff and cross-motions to seal Defendants’ motion (Doc 206)

23

identify of plaintiff and to re-tax costs was filed on September 25, 2012 and Defendants

24

Willits Charter School and Sally Rulison’s opposition was filed on October 4, 2012.

25

After full consideration of the moving papers, the opposition thereto, and the

26

authorities cited by the parties, the Court hereby denies plaintiff’s motion in its entirety.

27
28
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION TO
Case No. 09-3655 JSW
ISSUE JUDGMENT IN NAME OF IDENTITY OF MINOR
PLAINTIFF AND TO RE-TAX COSTS
1

Case3:09-cv-03655-JSW Document211 Filed11/13/12 Page2 of 2

1

Specifically, the Court finds that Defendants’ abstract of judgment has been

2

issued and properly recorded; plaintiff’s correct name is required to enforce the

3

judgment pursuant to C.C.P. § 674(a)(4); the request to seal Defendants’ motion is no

4

longer warranted; and plaintiff’s motion to re-tax costs is untimely, as plaintiff failed to

5

file a timely objection to Defendants' bill of costs as dictated by Civ. L.R. 54-2.

6
7

IT IS SO ORDERED.

8
9
10
11

November 13
Dated: _______________, 2012

___________________________
HON. JEFFREY S. WHITE
Judge of the United State District Court
Northern District of California

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION TO
Case No. 09-3655 JSW
ISSUE JUDGMENT IN NAME OF IDENTITY OF MINOR
PLAINTIFF AND TO RE-TAX COSTS
2