Hernandez v. Sutter West Capital Mortgage, Inc. et al

Filing 44

ORDER extending time to respond to complaint re 42 Stipulation filed by RBS Financial Products, Inc.. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 11/12/09. (be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/13/2009)

1 RICHARD J. SAHATJIAN (SBN 252442) [e-mail] 2 BUCKLEYSANDLER LLP 1801 Century Park East, Suite 2240 3 Los Angeles, CA 90067 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] 5 Of Counsel: BENJAMIN B. KLUBES 6 bklubes@ buckleysandler.com CAITLIN M. KASMAR 7 [e-mail] BUCKLEYSANDLER LLP 8 1250 24th Street, NW, Suite 700 Washington, DC 20037 9 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] 10 Attorneys for Defendant 11 RBS Financial Products, Inc. 12 *Additional parties and counsel listed on stipulation 13 14 15 16 ANTONIO HERNANDEZ, 17 18 v. Plaintiff, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION CASE NO. 3:09-CV-03658-CRB Hon. Charles R. Breyer

19 SUTTER WEST CAPITAL MORTGAGE, [PROPOSED] ORDER APPROVING INC., ARMANDO CHAVEZ, CHRISTINA STIPULATION EXTENDING 20 SAVALA, DANE ROBERT MACARTHER, JP DEFENDANT RBS FINANCIAL MORGAN CHASE BANK, NA, CHASE PRODUCTS, INC.'s TIME TO RESPOND 21 HOME FINANCE, LLC, FIRST SECURITY TO COMPLAINT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC., JAMES JOHN 22 CHAPMAN, MANNY RIVERA, PETER CONSULTER, MIGUEL ANGEL LOPEZ23 SOTELO, AMERICAN MORTGAGE NETWORK, WACHOVIA CAPITAL 24 FINANCE CORPORATION, VERTICE, WELLS FARGO BANK, LUMINENT 25 CAPITAL MORTGAGE, INC., RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE CAPITAL dba 26 FIRST SECURITY LOAN, RBS FINANCIAL PRODUCTS, INC., and Does 4 through 100, 27 Defendants. 28 -1ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

Hernandez v. Sutter West Capital Mortgage, et al., No. 3:09-CV-03658

1

Having read and considered the Stipulation Extending Defendant RBS Financial Products,

2 Inc.'s Time to Respond to Complaint, executed by and between Plaintiff Antonio Hernandez 3 ("Plaintiff") and Defendant RBS Financial Products, Inc. ("RBS"), and good cause appearing 4 therefore, 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 2. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. RBS is not required to file an answer or other response to Plaintiff's complaint on or before November 10, 2009; Within seven (7) days of this Court's order on Plaintiff's motion seeking leave to amend his complaint, Plaintiff and RBS shall confer on a reasonable schedule setting forth a date by which RBS must answer or otherwise respond to the complaint, and/or a briefing schedule on any motion to dismiss to be filed by RBS. The proposed schedule will be filed with the Court by joint stipulation within seven (7) days of this Court's order on Plaintiff's motion seeking leave to amend his complaint.

14 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 15 12 Dated: November ___, 2009

17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

ER

N

F D IS T IC T O R

ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

-2-

Hernandez v. Sutter West Capital Mortgage, et al., No. 3:09-CV-03658

A

C

LI

FO

harle Judge C

s R. Bre

yer

R NIA

ERED O ORD IT I S UNITED STATESSDISTRICT JUDGE
Hon. Charles R. Breyer

UNIT ED

16

By_____________________________

S

S DISTRICT TE C TA

RT U O

NO

RT

H