Jorge Quezada v. Con-Way Inc.

Filing 102

ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO MEET AND CONFER RE PENDING DISCOVERY DISPUTE. (njvlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/11/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 NOT FOR CITATION 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 EUREKA DIVISION 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 15 16 ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO MEET AND CONFER RE PENDING DISCOVERY DISPUTE Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 09-CV-03670 JSW (NJV) JORGE R. QUEZADA, v. CON-WAY, INC., Defendant. / 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The district court has referred all discovery matters in this case to the undersigned. (Doc. No. 86.) On February 8, 2013, the court received an email from Plaintiff's Counsel, indicating that a discovery dispute exists in this case regarding Defendant's response to Request No. 56. Counsel for both parties SHALL engage in an in-person meet and confer no later than February 19, 2013, regarding the pending discovery dispute. Given counsels' diverse locations, counsel may participate by telephone. Counsel shall engage in a meaningful meet and confer regarding outstanding discovery requests and the pending discovery dispute. Counsel shall notify the court’s courtroom deputy, Gloria Masterson (Gloria_Masterson@cand.uscourts.gov), by email of the scheduled date for the in-person meet and confer. After the in-person meet and confer, the parties shall promptly file a single joint letter brief to the court informing the court of the status of the in-person meet and confer. If the parties are unable to resolve their discovery disputes after the in-person meet and 1 confer, the single joint letter brief, no longer than five pages, with five pages of exhibits, shall 2 succinctly set forth the parties’ positions on each disputed issue. 3 Per this Court’s standing order, for future discovery-related motions, counsel must deliver 4 two (2) chambers copies of all filings. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 DATED: February 11, 2013 __________________ 8 Nandor J. Vadas United States Magistrate Judge 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?